The Recommended Budget Narrative Template outlines the requirements for presenting estimated expenses in program proposals to the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM). It details cost categories such as Personnel, Fringe Benefits, Travel, Equipment, Supplies, Contractual, Construction, Other Direct Costs, and Indirect Costs. For each category, instructions specify the necessary information, including position titles, salary details, travel logistics, equipment justifications, and documentation of direct costs. Organizations must ensure consistency between the budget detail and narrative, with a single document covering all years for multi-year proposals. The template emphasizes the need for clarity in explaining cost allocations, policy applications for fringe benefits, and justifications for all budget items, promoting transparency and adherence to PRM guidelines. The overarching purpose is to facilitate effective funding applications, ensuring that proposed budgets align with federal funding objectives while covering all essential program costs comprehensively.

The document outlines a federal government Request for Proposals (RFP) for project funding, specifically focusing on cost allocation across various categories for Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3. It details expense categories such as personnel, fringe benefits, travel, equipment, supplies, contractual costs, construction, and other direct costs, with placeholders indicating where organizations must enter financial figures. In addition to direct costs, the form highlights indirect costs and emphasizes the importance of providing cost shares from funding sources alongside federal support. Furthermore, specific objectives and associated costs are to be delineated, allowing for the segregation of expenses according to program goals—providing clarity on budgetary allocations. The document is structured methodically to ensure comprehensive financial planning for project execution, aligning with federal guidance on grant reporting and submissions. Its purpose lies in meticulous tracking of expenditure plans to enhance transparency and accountability in government-funded projects.

The document outlines the guidance for NGOs submitting concept notes for funding through the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM). It specifies that narratives should not exceed four pages (five for consortia) in a specified format and emphasizes strict adherence to page limits. A cover page summary table is required, detailing project information such as title, applicant organization, target countries, participant populations, funding amounts, and other specifics. The submission must include a detailed problem statement addressing the needs of target populations, program descriptions, expected outcomes, and the applicant organization’s relevant experience. The guidelines stress the importance of identifying vulnerable groups and ensuring at least 50% of participants are refugees or similar populations. It requests a budget summary and specific organizational documents. Overall, this document serves as a framework for organizations seeking federal grants aimed at enhancing assistance for vulnerable populations, particularly refugees and IDPs, through structured proposals that demonstrate need, strategic planning, and previous experience in relevant sectors.

The Project Report Template serves to standardize reporting for federal grants and cooperative agreements, aiming for simplicity while ensuring all essential elements are included. It covers vital organizational information, project details, and performance outcomes across multiple sections. Key areas include an assessment of overall project performance, programmatic changes, measurable results with an indicator table, and an analysis of program participants' demographics, ensuring inclusivity for marginalized groups. The template emphasizes the importance of community engagement, risk management, sustainability measures, collaboration, accountability, and adherence to U.S. government recognition requirements. Lessons learned in final reports will inform future initiatives, with recommendations for improving project design. This structured approach ensures clarity in communication between partners and the relevant government entities concerning project implementation, achievements, and adjustments in real-time.

The document outlines a risk assessment template designed to identify and evaluate risks associated with proposed projects within federal government RFPs and grants. It categorizes risks into five areas: safety and security, programmatic, fiduciary and legal, information technology, and reputational. Each category requires an assessment of the risk's likelihood and potential impact, along with planned mitigation strategies. The assessment emphasizes ongoing monitoring and updates throughout the project lifecycle. A specific focus is given to operating in locations with Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) or sanctioned actors, necessitating a thorough analysis of the local context, safeguards, and processes to prevent any legal or reputational exposure. The document also calls for the establishment of controls to prevent benefiting sanctioned groups inadvertently, ensuring that program participants are not affiliated with these organizations. Overall, the risk assessment serves as a critical framework for organizations to manage risks effectively and maintains compliance within the funding guidelines.

The document outlines requirements for applicants submitting safety and security plans as part of federal grants and operational proposals. It emphasizes the necessity of a tailored, location-specific safety plan to address the unique threats and vulnerabilities for all personnel, including partners and sub-recipients. The plan must include a contextual, threat, and vulnerability analysis, along with contingency planning for emergencies such as abductions, evacuations, and armed attacks. Applicants should reference guidelines from the Overseas Development Institute and ensure non-English plans have translated summaries. The document advises adherence to State Department travel advisories, UN security guidelines, and inclusion of security costs in budgets. Non-compliance may jeopardize funding. The primary intent is to minimize operational risks while ensuring that applicants are prepared for various environments relevant to their activities.

The PRM Funding proposal document outlines the requirements for submitting a single-year program proposal meant for federal funding consideration. It specifies that narratives should not exceed 15 pages, provide essential program details such as organization identity, participant demographics, and program goals. Applicants must demonstrate a clear understanding of target population needs through gap analysis and commit to accountability practices, including participant feedback mechanisms. The proposal also emphasizes the importance of a gender analysis, the incorporation of local capacity-building, sustainability of initiatives, and a management structure detailing past performance. Organizations may need to provide additional documentation, such as a market analysis for livelihood-focused programs and the Protection from Sexual Exploitation and Abuse code of conduct. Overall, the document serves as a comprehensive guide that governs the structure and content of proposals aimed at enhancing humanitarian efforts, ensuring eligibility for federal funding support, and fostering collaboration with various stakeholders.

The document outlines the proposal guidelines for organizations seeking multi-year funding from the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM). Following a specified format, proposals must not exceed 17 pages and include detailed program information such as participant demographics, funding requests, program objectives, and innovative elements. The document emphasizes the importance of identifying the target population and ensuring at least 50% of participants belong to PRM's populations of concern. Moreover, it requires a comprehensive program description, including a monitoring and evaluation plan, accountability mechanisms, coordination with stakeholders, and sustainability strategies. The proposal is expected to rely on recent data for needs assessments and to demonstrate how it expands upon existing efforts by local or international organizations. Additional requirements entail documentation of past performance and detailed plans for local capacity strengthening. Overall, the document serves as an essential roadmap for organizations aimed at securing PRM funding, highlighting the importance of thorough preparation, adherence to guidelines, and responsiveness to the needs of vulnerable populations in humanitarian settings.

This document provides detailed instructions for completing the PRM Indicator Table for proposals under FY 2025, aimed at standardizing performance indicators for PRM funding applications. It emphasizes the transition to an Excel template format and requires the use of PRM's standardized indicator titles from the NGO Guidelines. Each application must include vital data such as indicator names, baseline values, targets, cumulative target values, and methods of data collection to ensure effective program monitoring and evaluation. Importantly, three mandatory indicators must be present in all proposals regardless of program design, focusing on the number of individuals reached, funding distribution to local organizations, and participant feedback on service delivery. Partners are encouraged to propose custom indicators but should limit their number to maintain clarity. The document also outlines the criteria for setting targets, reporting methods, and ensures that indicators remain relevant and adaptable throughout the proposal's lifecycle. It stresses the importance of accurate data reporting and the necessity of justifications for any requested changes once the agreements are granted, ensuring compliance with PRM’s expectations for accountability and transparency in humanitarian efforts.

The U.S. Department of State's Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM) has issued guidelines for non-governmental organizations (NGOs) seeking funding for overseas assistance in FY 2025. The document outlines the application process, including required registrations with SAM.gov and Grants.gov, and emphasizes the importance of early registration to avoid delays. It details the submission requirements for proposals, including specific templates for narrative submissions, budgets, and monitoring plans, stressing adherence to page limits and use of clear formatting. The guidelines also highlight PRM's priorities in humanitarian assistance, emphasizing accountability to affected populations, sustainability, and gender inclusivity in project proposals. Moreover, it addresses the protocols for evaluating proposals based on a scorecard system and mandates that funded projects recognize U.S. government contributions. The guidelines signify the PRM's ongoing commitment to collaborative humanitarian efforts and the importance of timely and structured applications from NGOs.

The U.S. Department of State's Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM) is soliciting concept notes for programs aimed at assisting refugees and vulnerable populations in Jordan for Fiscal Year 2025. The initiative seeks to address humanitarian needs in sectors like protection, health, education, and livelihoods, emphasizing local organizational capacity and social cohesion. Eligible applicants include U.S.-based nonprofits, overseas nonprofits, and international organizations, excluding UN agencies. Budgets for proposals must range from $750,000 to $3,000,000 annually, with consortium submissions having slightly higher thresholds. Submissions via Grants.gov are due by January 9, 2025, and selected organizations will develop full proposals within 30 days of notification. The total anticipated funding is up to $12 million, with expectations of approximately six awards. The PRM encourages projects that focus on sustainability, innovative approaches, and alignment with existing frameworks like the Jordan Response Plan. Overall, this funding opportunity emphasizes collaboration and effective outcomes for vulnerable communities impacted by the refugee crisis in Jordan.

The Proposal Narrative for PRM Research Funding outlines the necessary components for organizations seeking federal funding for humanitarian research. It mandates a maximum 15-page proposal, detailing program information, background, methodology, gender analysis, and a comprehensive dissemination plan. Key sections include program objectives, research locations, ethical reviews, and the organization's capacity for conducting research. Proposals must also involve coordination with international agencies and indicate how the U.S. government's financial support will be acknowledged. Required documents such as completed forms, budget summary, and evidence of compliance with legal and financial standards are integral for consideration. The proposal aims to fill gaps in humanitarian knowledge, enhance existing resources, and ensure ethical research practice. Emphasizing a thorough review process, all documentation needs to be submitted in English and adhere to specific guidelines to avoid disqualification. Overall, the document serves as a framework for organizations to develop structured and accountable research proposals in support of vulnerable populations.

The U.S. Department of State's Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM) outlines performance indicators for funding programs in FY 2023. The document includes mandatory and specific indicators designed to measure program effectiveness across multiple sectors. Key indicators encompass the number of individuals reached by PRM funding, the amount of humanitarian funding distributed to local and national organizations, and the percentage of participants perceiving humanitarian assistance as safe and participatory. The document also details goals for capacity strengthening, inclusion of persons with disabilities, education, food security, health services, and protection services, among others. Each indicator includes definitions, calculation methods, required disaggregation of data, and reporting frequency to ensure comprehensive monitoring and evaluation of the assistance programs. The indicators contribute to meeting humanitarian objectives, enhancing accountability, and facilitating improvements in service delivery to vulnerable populations, including refugees, asylum-seekers, and conflicted-affected individuals. This structured approach highlights PRM’s commitment to transparency and efficacy in humanitarian aid while fulfilling federal requirements for grant administration and reporting.