The United States Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM) is seeking a contractor for a Blended Additive Fuel Study. The primary goal is to optimize fuel types for warfighter mission requirements by comparing commercial-grade jet fuel (JAA) with military specification (MILSPEC) fuel. The study will challenge the current policy of JP-8 as the standard fuel, assess operational and engineering implications of using JAA, and determine supply network benefits. Key tasks include program management, testing and validation of fuel types, and reporting findings. Deliverables include monthly status reports, quarterly briefings, and a final report with an in-person out brief. The period of performance is one year, from August 1, 2025, to July 31, 2026. Security and cybersecurity requirements are also detailed, emphasizing incident reporting and data protection, with a strict 72-hour reporting timeline for cyber incidents.
The United States Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM) has issued a Request for Information (RFI) for a Blended Additive Fuel Study (TRANSCOM25D015). This RFI is for market research to inform a planned 2025 contract for a study optimizing fuel types for warfighter mission requirements, aiming to standardize fuel delivery at the operational level. USTRANSCOM seeks information on existing market solutions and industry needs for a roadmap to success. This RFI is not a Request for Proposal (RFP) and will not result in a contract award. Responses, due by July 25, 2025, will be used for internal decision-making (e.g., acquisition strategy, small business concerns) and will not be disclosed outside the Government. The study will involve program management, testing/validation of MILSPEC fuel for optimization, comparing commercial-grade jet fuel (JAA) to MILSPEC, and reporting results. USTRANSCOM is particularly interested in capabilities to test the hypothesis of JAA as the primary battlefield fuel, determine restrictions on switching fuel types, assess current JP-8 policy, and compare operational implications with network benefits. They also request information on commercial availability, industry standards, typical contract types, lengths, pricing structures, cost-drivers, evaluation criteria, and potential organizational conflicts of interest. The anticipated contract award is Q4 FY25.
The United States Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM) issued a Statement of Objectives for a Blended Additive Fuel Study to enhance its Global Bulk Fuel Management and Delivery capabilities. The study seeks to assess the optimization of fuel types, particularly evaluating commercial-grade jet fuel (JAA) against military specification (MILSPEC) fuel for specific warfighter missions. The contract involves three primary tasks: program management and oversight, testing and validating fuel types, and reporting results. Contractors must provide monthly status reports, quarterly briefings, and a final report within designated timelines.
The scope includes analyzing the current fuel supply chain, testing the effectiveness of JAA versus JP-8 as battlefield fuels, and determining operational implications of switching fuel types. Security measures, including personnel qualifications, are emphasized, alongside requirements for cybersecurity incident reporting. The contract is structured as a non-personal services agreement, and performance standards include strict compliance with timelines for deliverables. The anticipated performance period is from August 2025 to July 2026, highlighting the necessity for contractors to deliver actionable insights that will benefit DoD operational capabilities in fuel management.
The United States Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM) is requesting information through a Request for Information (RFI) for a Blended Additive Fuel Study, anticipated to lead to a contract by Q4 FY25. This study aims to optimize fuel types for specific military mission requirements, focusing on the potential standardization of fuel delivered to warfighters. The RFI is intended for market research purposes only, and does not constitute a formal request for proposals. USTRANSCOM seeks input from interested parties regarding existing fuel solutions and market capabilities. Key tasks include program management, validation of military specification fuel, and timely reporting of study results. Interested companies are encouraged to detail their capabilities, business size, and any relevant experience in similar projects, while also addressing commercial availability and best practices in fuel management. The RFI outlines a submission timeline, emphasizing that responses should be sent electronically. USTRANSCOM welcomes participation from businesses of all sizes and aims for an inclusive approach to gathering insights that could enhance fuel supply network operations for the Department of Defense.
The document, titled "Fuel Additive Study RFI Questions & Answers," clarifies several aspects of a new government requirement for a fuel additive study. It confirms that the requirement is new and does not have an incumbent vendor. The study's scope involves testing and validating MILSPEC fuel, specifically comparing JAA to JP-8 (required) and F-76 (optional), while excluding JP-5 from the study in Task 1. It also clarifies that DLA regulation 4155.24 is irrelevant to the Statement of Objectives/Performance Work Statement. Furthermore, the government is seeking a new analysis to determine if the current policy of JP-8 as the primary fuel for warfighters is based on the most demanding or most needed requirements.
The document addresses a new requirement related to the testing and validation of MILSPEC fuels. It clarifies that there is no incumbent vendor associated with this requirement, confirming it as a fresh initiative. The document discusses the approach for testing, indicating that comparisons should be made between JAA fuel and JP-8, with F-76 as an optional comparison, while excluding JP-5 from the analysis. Furthermore, it seeks to understand the rationale behind using JP-8 as the primary fuel for military aircraft, specifically whether this decision is grounded in the most demanding operational requirements or based on need. The Government has requested a new analysis to determine the suitability of the current fuel policy for different aircraft. This document is part of government RFPs involving fuel additive studies, demonstrating the importance of compliance with military specifications to ensure operational effectiveness and safety.