The INL Change Map Template for FY23 outlines a project aimed at enhancing responses to sexual violence in COUNTRY X through the implementation of Sexual Assault Response Teams (SARTs). The initiative, led by ABC Org, is set to run from January 15, 2023, to January 31, 2025, and focuses on improving access to justice and protection services for victims. Key objectives include establishing fully functional national mechanisms aligned with international standards, equipping multidisciplinary teams with necessary skills, promoting awareness to encourage reporting of sexual assault cases, and fostering cooperative approaches among justice and law enforcement sectors. Core activities comprise sharing best practices from the U.S., conducting national workshops and training sessions for professionals, and targeted awareness campaigns to change societal attitudes towards sexual violence. Indicators for measuring success include the availability of resources, training outputs, victim reporting numbers, and the knowledge improvement of justice and law enforcement participants. The document emphasizes a structured approach to implementing effective interventions backed by clear objectives and measurable outcomes, aligning with broader federal and state goals for combating sexual violence and supporting victims.

The Budget Narrative Template outlines funding allocations for a project involving personnel, travel, equipment, supplies, contractual agreements, and indirect costs. Key personnel includes Emily Jones as Project Manager and a Finance Manager, with salaries and fringe benefits calculated based on outlined percentages. Travel expenses cover international flights and lodging for project staff visiting another country, complying with the Fly America Act and per diem guidelines. The equipment section specifies the acquisition of a Machine X for project use, while supplies detail costs for laptops and workshop materials. A subgrant is allocated to a local NGO, Org X, for specific activities, detailing funds for staff salaries, transportation, and workshop supplies. Indirect costs are calculated from a negotiated rate agreement, contributing to the overall project budget. The total project cost is summarized as $65,750, with a breakdown of direct and indirect costs. This document serves as a comprehensive proposal for funding consideration and provides a structured financial outline necessary for federal grants and RFPs.

The document outlines the budget structure for a project submitted by an organization seeking federal funding. It includes components like personnel costs, fringe benefits, travel expenses, equipment, supplies, contractual obligations, construction costs, and other direct costs, which together comprise total direct and indirect costs. The detailed budget template is organized into sections with line items for each cost category, allowing for a systematic breakdown of expenses. Specific focus is given to personnel (both US-based and field personnel), travel (domestic and international), and contractual costs involving consultants and subawards. Indirect costs, including overhead and general administrative expenses based on a negotiated indirect cost rate agreement (NICRA), are also noted. Total project costs must match the desired federal funding amount, which can include potential cost-sharing by the applicant. This document serves as a key element in responding to government RFPs and grants, demonstrating the project's financial viability and aligning costs with funding requirements.

The document outlines the framework for developing performance indicators related to federal projects, emphasizing the importance of valid outcome indicators to evaluate the success of initiatives. It details the structure of a Performance Indicator Reference Sheet (PIRS), where each indicator must align with specified goals, objectives, and activities. Key components include the definition of terms, data collection methodologies, reporting frequencies, and data limitations. The document underscores the necessity of disaggregating data by relevant categories such as sex, sector, and geographic regions to ensure comprehensive analysis. Additionally, practical insights are provided on designing effective indicators, distinguishing between outcome and output indicators, and aligning them with measurable goals. There is a clear directive for the collection and analysis of data, highlighting its validity, reliability, and usefulness for decision-making. The guidelines aim to facilitate systematic evaluation of projects funded through federal grants and RFPs, ensuring accountability and responsiveness to emerging findings. This structured approach supports the federal government’s strategic objectives in achieving transparency and effectiveness across varied initiatives.

The FY2025 INL Applicant Pre-Award Risk Survey is designed to assess organizations interested in receiving federal grants, focusing on their risk management capabilities. Key areas covered include general organizational information, internal controls, accounting systems, budgetary controls, audits, sub-recipient monitoring, consultant use, purchasing policies, personnel procedures, and travel protocols. For each section, applicants must provide yes/no responses and relevant details, demonstrating compliance with financial management standards and regulatory frameworks, such as 2 CFR 200. Important components include verifying incorporation, tax status, board structure, financial oversight, inventory management, and audit history. The survey also evaluates budgeting practices, procurement procedures, travel policies, and personnel management to ensure the organizations can effectively manage federal funds. Ultimately, the survey aims to establish the applicant's eligibility and readiness to handle financial requirements associated with federal funding, thereby mitigating risks before any grant award is made. This thorough process underscores the government's commitment to transparency and accountability in grant management.

The INL Change Map Template for FY23, updated on October 17, 2022, serves as a structured approach to link project goals, objectives, and activities with corresponding monitoring indicators. Its primary purpose is to ensure alignment with strategic policy goals, including Functional Bureau Strategy (FBS) and Integrated Country Strategy (ICS). The template includes sections for project details, strategic alignment, and a clear mapping of goals to measurable indicators. Each goal and objective should articulate expected changes rather than activities performed by the implementing organizations, emphasizing clarity and specificity. The document also provides instructions on defining terms, ensuring consistency, and articulating precise changes for effective monitoring. It emphasizes the importance of setting clear and actionable goals to assess project impact accurately. Overall, the Change Map Template is a critical tool for effective project design and management within the context of federal initiatives aimed at fostering significant on-ground results in various regions.

The U.S. Department of State's Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL) has issued a Notice of Funding Opportunity for the "Law Enforcement Critical Skills Training for Bosnia and Herzegovina." This initiative aims to enhance the capabilities of law enforcement officers in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) through six specialized training courses over a 24-month implementation period, beginning in March 2025. The initiative addresses critical needs in areas such as active shooter responses, cybercrime investigations, and narcotics investigations. A total of $430,000 is available for distribution, with a minimum award of $375,000 and a maximum of $430,000, and the program anticipates awarding two grants. Eligible applicants include U.S. and foreign non-profit organizations and educational institutions, with a focus on inclusivity regarding ethnic and gender representation in participant selection. The proposal submission deadline is February 2, 2023, via Grants.gov, and applicants must ensure compliance with various federal regulations and requirements. The INL emphasizes a commitment to enhancing the rule of law and reducing corruption and crime, vital for stabilizing BiH as a U.S. partner.

The Sample Risk Assessment outlines potential risks associated with establishing political think-tanks in countries with restrictive political environments. Key risks identified include the harassment of civil society partners, potential biases against think tank credibility, shifts in political power following elections, limited engagement with government on accountability issues, financial transfer complications, and low capacity in managing small grants among advocacy organizations. To mitigate these risks, the plan emphasizes maintaining close communication with local partners, providing security training, modifying work plans as necessary, and leveraging existing relationships for better advocacy. Financial risks are addressed through the identification of alternative payment methods to ensure funds reach partners, along with training and support to enhance the capabilities of advocacy CSOs. The assessment is critical for securing federal grants and RFPs, providing insight into the necessary precautions and strategic approaches to working within challenging political landscapes while fostering civil society's role in advocacy and research.