The Budget Justification Worksheet for the National Maritime Heritage Grants Program outlines the essential requirements for budget submissions related to grant applications. It emphasizes the need for clarity and justification of costs, categorizing expenses into administrative and program costs while adhering to specific eligibility criteria.
Key elements include a detailed breakdown of personnel, fringe benefits, travel, equipment, supplies, contractual fees, construction materials, and indirect charges. Administrative costs must not exceed 7.5% of the overall budget, and personnel costs are limited to federal salary ceilings. Additionally, applicants must justify any required administrative costs, ensure non-overlap in federal funding, and provide details on past grants and matching funds.
The worksheet requires an organization's financial management practices to comply with federal standards and details the importance of thorough documentation for non-federal match sources. Overall, this form serves as a crucial component in the grant application process to ensure transparency, compliance, and appropriate use of federal funds.
The document outlines a checklist for applicants submitting to the National Maritime Heritage Grants Program, which supports preservation and education initiatives related to maritime heritage. It emphasizes the importance of aligning budget figures in various forms, such as SF-424 and Budget Justification, ensuring they match for consistency. Necessary budget inclusions are highlighted, including costs for public notices, nominations for historic designation, and administrative expenses.
The checklist specifies required attachments, such as a Project Narrative responding to merit review criteria, a Budget Narrative, and supporting project images. If applicable, a Letter of Owner Consent is needed to affirm permission for submission and proposed work. The Project Narrative must clearly state project goals without broader context, and all images should explicitly illustrate the work being funded. This structured checklist serves to streamline the application process, ensuring comprehensive submission that meets federal grant standards and facilitates successful project funding.
The National Maritime Heritage Grant Program, established under the National Maritime Heritage Act, offers financial assistance for preservation and educational projects related to America's maritime heritage. The program emphasizes a cost-sharing mechanism where federal funding is matched by non-federal contributions. The anticipated total funding for 2024 is $3 million, with project awards ranging from $100,000 to $750,000.
Eligible applicants include State Historic Preservation Offices and affiliated organizations. The application process requires both a clear description of project objectives and a mandated educational component to ensure broad public outreach. The program focuses on various maritime resources, including historic maritime properties, collections, and traditional maritime skills.
Applications undergo a merit review based on established criteria, including project feasibility, educational reach, and the qualifications of key personnel. A total of ten grant awards are expected, with application submissions due by February 4, 2025. Successful applicants will be notified approximately six months later, with project work anticipated to start in October 2025. This funding opportunity serves as a vital resource for promoting public understanding and preservation of significant maritime heritage across the United States.
The document outlines the application process for a federal grant related to historic preservation through the Save America’s Treasures program. It provides a structure for applicants to submit essential information, including details about the historic resource, ownership, grant program specifics, project type, and financial requests. Each application must address four merit review criteria with a character limit of 6,000 for each response, accompanied by a project timeline. It emphasizes the importance of adhering to the Merit Review Criteria and application instructions found in the Notice of Funding Opportunity. The document ensures that applicants can obtain further guidance through a dedicated FAQ link. Overall, it serves as a template for applicants to effectively present their project proposals for federal funding aimed at preserving historic sites.
The document provides comprehensive guidelines for completing a Budget Justification Worksheet as part of federal grant applications. It outlines the breakdown of total project costs into categories, including personnel, fringe benefits, travel, equipment, supplies, contractual fees, construction/labor costs, and indirect charges, emphasizing the necessity for all expenses to be eligible, reasonable, and directly related to the project. Notably, administrative costs are limited to 25% of total project costs funded through the Historic Preservation Fund.
Applicants must specify staff involvement, including roles, time allocation, and salary, and detail travel logistics when applicable. Equipment versus supplies distinction is crucial, as items under $5,000 are classified as supplies. The worksheet also requires applicants to document any hired consultants, specifying fees and adhering to competitive procurement practices.
Indirect costs must comply with federally negotiated rates or a De Minimis rate, while ensuring consistency with SF-424A and SF-424C forms. The document concludes with instructions for non-Federal applicants to provide their recent fiscal year data. This detailed guidance aims to assist applicants in preparing accurate and compliant budget justifications for grant funding opportunities.
The National Maritime Heritage Grants Program by the National Park Service outlines requirements for protecting historic maritime resources through easements, covenants, or memoranda of agreement relevant to development/construction projects. The document emphasizes the necessity for the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) to select the appropriate legal protection based on project specifics and funding amounts. Timeline requirements specify that a draft document be submitted within 12 months of project initiation, with a final draft due by the end of the project period.
Specific legal protections are categorized as follows: covenants for subgrant projects involving personal property, memoranda of agreement for in-house developments, and easements for projects involving real property like lighthouses. Funding amounts dictate the duration of the required legal protections, ranging from a minimum of five years for grants under $50,000 to 25 years for grants over $750,000. Interested parties can access more information through the program's website or contact the program directly. This guidance is meant to ensure the preservation of valuable maritime cultural resources through appropriate legal frameworks.
The National Maritime Heritage Grants Program Project Images Worksheet outlines the requirements for submitting images as part of grant applications. Applicants must provide high-quality photographs capturing current conditions of the historical resources, including examples of damage and details pertinent to the proposed project. A minimum of one current photo and one overall photo is required. Both color and black-and-white images are acceptable, and all images must include captions and proper photo credits. The worksheet emphasizes that submitted materials will become the property of the National Park Service (NPS) for potential reproduction without permission but with appropriate credit. For additional guidance and FAQs, applicants are directed to the NPS maritime grants website. This document is crucial as part of the application process for federal grants, ensuring that visual documentation supports the preservation and recognition of maritime heritage resources.