The Recommended Budget Narrative Template provided by PRM serves to guide organizations in detailing budget estimates for proposed programs, whether fully funded by PRM or supported by multiple donors. The narrative should align with the budget detail, covering multiple years if applicable. Key components include: 1. **Personnel**: Detail positions, salaries, and time commitments, providing justification for total costs. 2. **Fringe Benefits**: Include rates based on established agreements or company policies. 3. **Travel**: Specify travel details, including purpose, costs, and duration. 4. **Equipment**: List non-expendable equipment purchases with justifications. 5. **Supplies**: Provide costs for general office and program supplies. 6. **Contractual**: Identify consultants and partners with attached detailed budgets. 7. **Construction**: Describe minor construction activities, adhering to funding policy. 8. **Other Direct Costs**: Include rent, utilities, and communication expenses. 9. **Indirect Costs**: Show the amount and basis for indirect costs, referencing applicable agreements. This structured approach ensures transparency and clarity in budget proposals, aligning with federal funding processes and requirements for accountability and effectiveness in program execution. Overall, the document emphasizes the importance of precision and detailed justification in budgetary submissions.

The document outlines a funding proposal framework associated with federal grants and RFPs aimed at addressing various program objectives, particularly in humanitarian and development contexts. It emphasizes the necessity for detailed financial reporting over multiple years, categorizing projected costs into direct expenses (like personnel, travel, and supplies) and indirect costs. Each section requests specific breakdowns for international and local staff expenses, fringe benefits, and detailed travel costs, indicating a focus on transparency and accuracy in funding requests. The framework also mandates structuring costs according to program objectives and potential cost-sharing arrangements. Additional sections request estimations for costs related to Gender-Based Violence (GBV) initiatives, which underscores the commitment to addressing sensitive issues within global projects. The document encourages organizations to specify how funding contributes to targeted outcomes, evidencing a comprehensive approach to project budgeting and impact measurement. This structured format aims to facilitate the evaluation of proposals by ensuring consistency and clarity in financial documentation, ultimately enhancing the efficiency of funding allocation in government-related projects.

This document outlines the submission guidelines for NGOs seeking funding from the federal government, particularly through the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM). It provides a structured template for concept notes that includes a project information table, a problem statement, program description, outcomes, organizational experience, and additional requirements for consortium applications. Key elements include a strict four-page limit for narratives (or five for consortia), a focus on vulnerable populations (including refugees), and the need for evidence-based assessments validating the project’s rationale. The proposal must clearly articulate participant demographics, location details, and how the program aligns with humanitarian standards. Required documents for application submission encompass a budget summary, SF-424 forms, and a comprehensive concept note. This framework facilitates systematic evaluation and selection based on the organization's capacity to address specific needs of target populations while adhering to the PRM's guidelines and standards. Overall, the document emphasizes clarity, compliance with page limits, and a structured approach to presenting essential information for funding consideration.

The proposal outlines the requirements for Multi-Year Program funding through the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM). Organizations must submit a narrative not exceeding 17 pages, detailing program goals, objectives, participant demographics, and a gap analysis illustrating the needs the program aims to address. Key elements include primary contacts, estimated funding requests across multiple years, and a description of innovative approaches if applicable. The document emphasizes the importance of including at least 50% of PRM’s populations of concern in the participant demographic. Additionally, applicants are required to provide a comprehensive program description covering implementation plans, gender analysis, and strategies for monitoring and evaluation, ensuring accountability to affected populations. Coordination with other stakeholders and sustainability plans after funding concludes are also critical aspects. A detailed checklist of application documents is provided, highlighting conditional forms and compliance requirements, including codes of conduct related to protection from sexual exploitation. Overall, the guidance aims to facilitate the proposal process while ensuring effective programmatic outcomes in the humanitarian sector.

The Project Report Template outlines the essential information and structure for reporting on federally funded projects. It provides a format for organizations to summarize key details such as the project name, funding amount, timeline, objectives, and contacts. The report emphasizes overall performance, addressing achievements and challenges while focusing on the needs of diverse populations, particularly vulnerable groups. Further sections prompt organizations to discuss programmatic changes, measuring results through detailed indicators, and participant demographics. The template also includes components related to accountability to affected populations, risk management, sustainability, collaboration, and recognition of U.S. government support. Key areas include lessons learned from project execution, ensuring future adaptations are informed by prior experiences. The format aims to streamline reporting while ensuring compliance with funding requirements and promoting stakeholder engagement, ultimately fostering accountability and improvement in project delivery across various government-funded initiatives.

The "Risk Assessment and Security Plan Template" serves as a critical guideline for organizations undertaking federal programs, emphasizing the continuous identification and mitigation of risks. The document outlines a structured approach to assess both internal and external risks impacting program safety and effectiveness. It highlights the importance of ongoing risk analysis, emphasizing risk mitigation strategies that address issues such as fraud, safety threats, compliance with U.S. regulations, and protection of personal data. Furthermore, organizations must submit a detailed security plan that addresses unique threats based on the operational environment, incorporating contingency plans for emergencies such as abductions or armed attacks. The document explicitly requires assessments of contextual, threat, and vulnerability factors, highlighting the need for organizations to ensure due diligence in screening for sanctioned groups and terrorist actors, especially in high-risk areas. The template mandates organizations to clearly articulate their strategies for preventing interference from sanctioned entities and ensure that assistance reaches intended recipients without diversion. This comprehensive directive aims to uphold safety standards and mitigate risks throughout the lifecycle of government-funded programs, ensuring the protection of both participants and organizational integrity.

The document outlines the proposal requirements for organizations seeking PRM funding for single-year programs. It specifies that narratives must not exceed 15 pages, excluding annexes, and must follow strict formatting guidelines. Key components of the proposal include a program summary, target population profile, program objectives, implementation plans, and monitoring and evaluation strategies. Essential elements also involve demonstrating a clear understanding of the needs addressed by the program, ensuring at least 50% of participants are from PRM’s defined populations of concern, and illustrating how the program will foster sustainability and strengthen local capacities. Furthermore, the document emphasizes the importance of participation from affected populations in program design and accountability measures. It encourages detailed descriptions of stakeholder coordination, management structures, and any subcontractors involved. Proposers must demonstrate past performance in relevant sectors and submit various forms and additional documentation as part of their application. The procedures for recognizing U.S. government financial support are also outlined, emphasizing the importance of branding and marking. This structured approach aims to ensure that proposals are comprehensive, addressing specific humanitarian needs effectively.

The document provides instructions for filling out the PRM Indicator Table for Fiscal Year 2024, aimed at organizations seeking funding from the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM). It outlines the requirement to use standardized performance indicators to facilitate data collection and cross-program aggregation. Partners must complete a comprehensive indicator table that includes specific data fields such as baseline values, yearly targets, cumulative targets, objectives, and data collection methods. Key indicators identified as mandatory include the number of individuals directly reached by PRM funding, the amount of PRM humanitarian funding distributed to local organizations, and the percentage of participants reporting safe delivery of humanitarian assistance. Custom indicators can also be included but must follow SMART criteria. The document emphasizes the importance of accurate data reporting, alignment with previous awards, and adherence to PRM guidelines for proposal submissions. Strong justifications are required for any amendments to indicators post-award. This guidance is critical for organizations to ensure compliance with PRM funding requirements, monitor program effectiveness, and align with humanitarian standards. Overall, the focus is on structured proposal submissions that capture measurable outcomes relevant to PRM objectives.

The U.S. Department of State's Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM) provides guidelines for NGOs applying for humanitarian assistance funding for FY 2024. The PRM facilitates support for refugees, internally displaced persons, and vulnerable migrants, emphasizing partnerships with multilateral organizations and civil society. This document outlines application requirements, processes, and key changes, such as updates on registration procedures with SAM.gov and Grants.gov, new scoring criteria, and the integration of risk assessments into funding proposals. Significant updates include the consolidation of budget templates, modified page limits, and specific post-distribution monitoring requirements for cash and voucher assistance programs. The application must include a comprehensive proposal narrative detailing the program's objectives, target populations, activities, management structure, and monitoring and evaluation plans. Additionally, organizations must adhere to branding guidelines acknowledging U.S. government support in all materials. This document aims to ensure effective allocation of government resources while promoting innovative approaches to humanitarian aid through structured application processes.

The FY 2024 General NGO Guidelines for Overseas Assistance, issued by the Department of State's Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM), outline the expectations and requirements for non-governmental organizations (NGOs) applying for U.S. humanitarian assistance. PRM is committed to advocating for and protecting vulnerable populations, including refugees and conflict victims, by partnering with NGOs and multilateral organizations. The guidelines detail several updates, including streamlined application processes, registration requirements through SAM.gov and Grants.gov, new risk assessment protocols, and specific scoring criteria emphasizing innovative program ideas. Applications must include a proposal narrative, budget, and compliance documents, all formatted appropriately. Key requirements also entail conducting thorough needs assessments, describing program objectives clearly, ensuring accountability to affected populations, and demonstrating sustainability in program delivery. Additionally, funded organizations must acknowledge U.S. government contributions publicly at project sites. Overall, these guidelines aim to foster effective and collaborative humanitarian assistance approaches while ensuring that organizations adhere to U.S. policies and humanitarian standards.

The document outlines the guidelines for submitting a research funding proposal to the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM). Proposals should not exceed 15 pages and must adhere to specific formatting requirements. Key sections include program information, participant demographics, background on humanitarian knowledge gaps, literature review, methodology, and gender analysis. The proposal must clearly articulate the research's objectives, ethical considerations, and a dissemination plan for sharing findings with the humanitarian community. Additionally, it requires detailed documentation, including budgets, organizational information, and acknowledgment of U.S. government support. Sub-contractors must be vetted to comply with anti-terrorism regulations. The overall aim is to enhance humanitarian programs through evidence-based research, building local capacities and ensuring the ethical treatment of participants. Acknowledgment of support from PRM is mandatory, with provisions for exemptions to protect participant safety. This comprehensive framework is geared towards fostering collaboration and maximizing the impact of humanitarian initiatives.

The U.S. Department of State's Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM) outlines its performance indicators and definitions for fiscal year 2023, aimed at assessing the effectiveness of humanitarian programs. Key indicators include the number of individuals directly reached through PRM funding, the amount of funds distributed to local organizations, and participant satisfaction regarding the delivery of humanitarian assistance. The document details various sectors such as health, education, food security, and mental health, emphasizing outcomes for refugees, internally displaced persons, and other vulnerable populations. Specific calculations for each indicator are provided, addressing how to count individuals, funds, and program participation, stressing the need for unique counting to avoid duplication. Inclusion of marginalized groups, like persons with disabilities, is highlighted, requiring adherence to the Washington Group on Disability Statistics for accurate reporting. The structured approach ensures comprehensive monitoring of PRM-funded interventions, aiming for accountability and effectiveness in humanitarian assistance delivery, aligned with local capacity strengthening and community involvement, reflective of best practices in federal grants and RFPs within government frameworks.