The document outlines the revised common instructions for applicants to the Department of Education's discretionary grant programs, published on December 23, 2024. It supersedes the previous instructions from December 2022, aiming to provide clearer guidance, particularly regarding the usage of Artificial Intelligence in applications. Key information includes application submission details, requirements for registration on Grants.gov, and essential identifiers such as the Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) and Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN). Applicants must submit proposals electronically through Grants.gov, adhering to specific formatting guidelines, and may utilize AI responsibly in developing their applications. The document stresses the importance of timely submission to meet deadlines, noting that technical issues with Grants.gov could lead to deadline extensions if verified. Moreover, paper applications are discouraged, but provisions exist for those lacking internet access, requiring prior notification. It emphasizes the necessity for accessibility in the application process for individuals with disabilities. The revisions reflect the Department's commitment to streamlining the application process while incorporating innovative technologies responsibly, thus ensuring equitable access to educational funding opportunities.

The document outlines two separate federal initiatives: one regarding the research and conservation of gray whales in Alaska, and another detailing the Developing Hispanic-Serving Institutions (DHSI) Program. The whale research aims to better understand population dynamics and foraging behaviors through various methods such as tagging and biological sampling, with a permit issued valid until April 2026. Compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act has been established, emphasizing that the permitted activities will not disadvantage endangered species. The DHSI Program, announced by the Department of Education, invites applications for grants aimed at enhancing educational opportunities for Hispanic students in eligible institutions. The program offers competitive preference priorities, targeting rural and new potential grantees, and allocates nearly $67 million in grants, with a maximum award of $600,000 per year. The document specifies eligibility criteria, funding restrictions, application and submission guidelines, and review processes to ensure successful achievement of educational goals related to Hispanic students’ academic attainment and institutional improvement. Together, these initiatives reflect government efforts to further research and support underrepresented communities in education.

The document outlines pre-application live question and answer (Q&A) sessions for applicants interested in the Developing Hispanic-Serving Institutions (DHSI) program for FY 2025. It provides essential details on technical assistance, instructing prospective applicants to access a pre-recorded webinar available on the DHSI program webpage for preliminary information. Two live Q&A sessions are scheduled for June 11 and June 12, 2025, where participants can join through Microsoft Teams or dial in by phone for assistance on their applications. Each session includes Meeting IDs and passcodes for access. The primary purpose of these sessions is to support applicants in navigating the federal grant application process effectively, highlighting the government's commitment to fostering educational institutions that serve Hispanic students. The document is structured to provide clear, actionable information to assist prospective applicants in understanding the application process and addressing any questions they may have.

This document serves as a comprehensive guide for organizations preparing to apply for grants from the U.S. Department of Education (ED). It outlines key preparation steps, including obtaining a Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) number through SAM.gov and registering with Grants.gov. Applicants are advised to familiarize themselves with the grants forecast, explore project ideas, and engage with potential partners well in advance of the application deadlines. The application process itself begins with reviewing the Notice Inviting Applications (NIA), which details eligibility, requirements, and selection criteria. The document emphasizes the importance of addressing various priority types outlined in the NIA, such as Absolute Priorities and Competitive Preference Priorities. To submit an application, organizations must create a Workspace on Grants.gov. The document provides detailed instructions on navigating the application process, including formatting requirements and submission protocols. It emphasizes the need for timely submission to avoid technical issues and provides resources for additional support, such as training webinars and contact information for competition managers. Overall, this resource empowers organizations to effectively prepare and submit applications for federal grants, ensuring compliance with ED's rigorous standards and processes.

The Logic Model Rubric is a comprehensive evaluation tool designed to assess program proposals related to federal and state grants and RFPs. It focuses on five critical components: Goals, Inputs, Activities, Outputs, and Outcomes, providing a structured way to gauge the preparedness and coherence of project proposals. Each component is rated on a scale from exemplary to poor, identifying strengths and weaknesses in how each element aligns with the overarching objectives of the grant program. The rubric emphasizes the importance of clearly articulated goals that are measurable and relevant to the grant’s purpose. It stresses the need for sufficient inputs, detailed and feasible activities, quantifiable outputs, and meaningful outcomes that demonstrate change. Furthermore, the document defines key terms and outlines the significance of each criterion in contributing to a well-planned project. By providing specific guidance and standards for evaluation, the Logic Model Rubric assists reviewers in determining the viability and clarity of proposals, fostering effective project planning and implementation aligned with federal requirements. This systematic approach is crucial for grantees to secure funding and ensure accountability within educational programs.

The document serves as a guideline for hiring and working with a third-party evaluator in project evaluations. It emphasizes the benefits, such as technical expertise and objectivity, against potential limitations like added costs and management tasks. The document highlights the importance of hiring an evaluator early, conducting a needs assessment to specify tasks and allocate budget, and emphasizes ongoing staff involvement and communication with the evaluator. Key steps include developing a detailed scope of work, establishing an evaluation budget, searching for qualified evaluators, preparing a comprehensive contract, and maintaining a strong working relationship throughout the evaluation process. The overall intention is to ensure successful evaluations that align with project proposals while enhancing objectivity and credibility through external expertise. This resource is significant for organizations engaged in federal grants and RFPs, as it provides a structured approach to incorporating external evaluators effectively.