Attachment (A) outlines a standardized format for documenting specialized experience in architectural and engineering (A-E) projects, likely for government RFPs or grants. It provides a template for up to ten example projects, requiring detailed information for each. Key data points include project title and location, construction type (new or renovation), year design services were completed, estimated construction cost and completion year, and the project role (Prime A-E or Sub Consultant). The form also mandates checking applicable specialized design/engineering services (e.g., technical specs, cost estimates, design-build RFP documents, engineering studies) and disciplines involved (e.g., architect, civil, structural, mechanical, electrical, cybersecurity, cost estimator). Finally, it requires identification of relevant facility types, such as multi-unit dwellings, administration buildings, industrial facilities, educational institutions, retail spaces, or community support facilities. This attachment serves as a critical tool for evaluating a firm's qualifications and relevant project history for government contracts.

Attachment (B) outlines a standardized format for submitting Key Personnel Resume Supplemental Information, crucial for Criterion 2 evaluations in government contracts such as RFPs or grants. This attachment is structured to gather detailed information on up to five relevant projects for each key personnel. For each project, it requires details such as the project title and location, construction type (new construction or renovation), completion years for design services and construction, the role of the firm (prime A-E or sub-consultant), and the specific work performed. It also categorizes the specified design/engineering services and relevant project types, including multi-unit dwellings, administration, industrial, education, retail, and community support facilities. This standardized form ensures that all essential qualifications and experiences of key personnel are uniformly presented and easily assessed against the project's requirements.

The NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (Form PPQ-0) is a critical document for evaluating contractor performance in federal government RFPs. It collects detailed information on contractor firms, their role in past projects (prime, sub, or joint venture), contract specifics like type and value, and a description of the project's complexity and relevance. The questionnaire is divided into sections for the contractor to complete (Blocks 1-4) and the client to complete (Blocks 5-8). Clients are requested to assess the contractor's performance across key areas including quality, schedule/timeliness, customer satisfaction, management/personnel/labor, cost/financial management, and safety/security. Performance is rated using an adjective scale (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, Not Applicable) with specific definitions for each rating. The form also includes sections for clients to provide narrative feedback on strengths, weaknesses, and an overall rating, which assists NAVFAC in evaluating performance risk. The government reserves the right to verify all submitted information.

This document addresses questions regarding solicitation N62478-25-R-5045, confirming it is a new and distinct contract with no incumbent contractor currently performing the outlined services. The solicitation is similar in scope but different from N6247825R5044. The government intends for the prime contractor to provide architectural services, maintaining NAICS Code 541330 despite suggestions to change it to reflect engineering work.

The Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command (NAVFAC) Hawaii is seeking Architect-Engineer (A-E) services for multi-discipline design and engineering projects. This Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract, set aside for small businesses, has a base period of one year with four one-year options, and a six-month extension option, not to exceed $20,000,000. Services include project documentation, design-build RFP documents, engineering studies, and post-construction award services for various facility types. Selection criteria, in descending order of importance, include specialized experience, professional qualifications, past performance, program management and capacity, quality control, firm location, sustainable design, and volume of work as a tiebreaker. Interested firms must submit a completed SF330 package by December 9, 2025, at 2:00 PM Hawaii Standard Time, ensuring SAM registration is current.