Compliance with Final Order in Jenner & Block, LLP v. Executive Office of the President
ID: Compliance_with_Final_Order_in_Jenner_Block_LLP_v_Executive_Office_of_the_PresidentType: Special Notice
Overview

Buyer

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Original Source

https://sam.gov/opp/eeb31fe95ce349d8954c74d556144d8f/view
Timeline
    Description

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a special notice regarding compliance with a Federal District Court order in the case of Jenner & Block, LLP v. Executive Office of the President. The court has permanently enjoined the enforcement of Executive Order 14246, which mandated federal officials to reverse any actions taken under its provisions, thereby requiring all EPA personnel and contractors to disregard this Executive Order. This ruling underscores the importance of adhering to legal obligations and navigating the regulatory landscape, as the EPA must comply with the court's directives to avoid penalties for contempt. For further guidance, recipients are instructed to contact their contracting officer or the Office of General Counsel as necessary.

    Point(s) of Contact
    No information provided.
    Files
    Title
    Posted
    Compliance with Final Order in Jenner and Block LLP v Executive Office of the President.pdf
    This communication from Kimberly Y. Patrick, Deputy Assistant Administrator for the EPA, addresses compliance with a Federal District Court order related to Executive Order 14246, signed by the President on March 25, 2025. The Court has permanently enjoined the implementation of this Executive Order, mandating all EPA personnel, including staff and contractors, to disregard and reverse any actions taken in its enforcement. While the Executive Branch asserts the legality of the Executive Order and the Department of Justice is exploring potential appeals, the EPA is required to comply with the Court's directives to avoid penalties for contempt. The message emphasizes the importance of adhering to legal obligations, and recipients are instructed to share this information within their organizations and contact the Office of General Counsel for further guidance. This highlights the regulatory landscape and the need for agencies to navigate legal and operational frameworks diligently.
    US_DIS_DCD_1_25cv916_d24647500e14652_ORDER_granting_in_part_and_denying_in_part_141_def.pdf
    The United States District Court for the District of Columbia addressed the case of Jenner & Block LLP versus the U.S. Department of Justice, focusing on Executive Order 14246, which was deemed retaliatory and a violation of the First Amendment. The Court issued an injunction halting the enforcement of specific sections (2-5) of the executive order, instructing federal officials to reverse any actions taken under these provisions. However, while the injunction did not permanently ban all consideration of Section 1, the Court recognized its integral role in justifying the other sections and mandated that its past applications be rescinded. The defendants sought clarification regarding the implications of the Court's order on Section 1, which was denied, as it was maintained that past actions influenced by this section must be undone. Additionally, the Court clarified that the injunction concerning Section 4 was applicable only to Jenner & Block LLP, without affecting wider investigations by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. This ruling illustrates the balance between federal executive actions and constitutional rights.
    US_DIS_DCD_1_25cv916_d29272699e14485_ORDER_granting_19_Jenner_s_motions_for_summary_jud.pdf
    The United States District Court for the District of Columbia has issued an order in the case of Jenner & Block LLP against the U.S. Department of Justice and other defendants. The court granted Jenner & Block's motion for summary judgment, declaring that Executive Order 14246, which aimed to impose restrictions related to the firm, is unlawful under the First Amendment and thus null and void. The order prohibits the defendants from enforcing any measures in the Executive Order, including security clearance reviews, investigations, or disclosure requests concerning the firm. Additionally, all federal employees and contractors are directed to disregard the Executive Order in their dealings with Jenner & Block and resume normal business operations with the firm. The defendants are required to report back to the court within three business days regarding their compliance with this order. The comprehensive list of entities affected by this ruling includes various federal departments and agencies, emphasizing its far-reaching implications across government operations. The court's action highlights a significant legal precedent safeguarding First Amendment rights against unjust executive actions.
    Similar Opportunities
    Compliance with District Court order permanently enjoining implementation and enforcement of Executive Order 14230 – Addressing Risk from Perkins Coie LLP
    Buyer not available
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is issuing a special notice regarding compliance with a District Court order that permanently enjoins the implementation and enforcement of Executive Order 14230, which addressed alleged risks from Perkins Coie LLP. All EPA employees and contractors are directed to disregard the Executive Order and reverse any actions taken under it, following the court's ruling that deemed the Order unlawful for violating constitutional rights. This decision highlights the importance of adhering to judicial mandates in government operations, particularly concerning federal contracts and regulatory actions. For further inquiries, personnel are encouraged to contact their contracting officer or the Office of General Counsel for guidance on compliance measures.
    Compliance with District Court Order Permanently Enjoining Implementation and Enforcement of Executive Order 14263 – "Addressing Risk from Susman Godfrey"
    Buyer not available
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is issuing a special notice regarding compliance with a U.S. District Court order that permanently enjoins the implementation and enforcement of Executive Order 14263, titled "Addressing Risk from Susman Godfrey LLP." The court's ruling, which declared the executive order unconstitutional, mandates that the EPA and other federal agencies cease any actions related to the order, including rescinding guidance and reversing security clearance actions taken under it. This compliance is crucial to avoid potential contempt penalties, and all staff and contractors are instructed to disregard the executive order and maintain normal business interactions with Susman Godfrey LLP. For further inquiries, affected parties are encouraged to contact their contracting officer for guidance on adhering to the court's directives.
    Compliance with Final Order in Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP v. Executive Office of the President
    Buyer not available
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is addressing compliance with a court ruling related to Executive Order 14250, which was deemed unconstitutional by the U.S. District Court. All EPA employees and contractors are instructed to disregard this Executive Order and reverse any actions taken in its implementation, following a permanent injunction issued on May 27, 2025. This ruling underscores the importance of adhering to judicial decisions within federal governance, ensuring that constitutional rights are upheld and that executive actions are subject to judicial review. For further inquiries, personnel are encouraged to contact their contracting officer or the Office of General Counsel as appropriate.
    Compliance with Temporary Restraining Order on implementation and enforcement of Sections 1, 3, and 5 of Executive Order 14263 – “Addressing Risk from Susman Godfrey”
    Buyer not available
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is addressing compliance with a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) that halts the implementation and enforcement of specific sections of Executive Order 14263, titled “Addressing Risks from Susman Godfrey.” The directive, issued by Kimberly Y. Patrick, Deputy Assistant Administrator, instructs all EPA employees and contractors to disregard Sections 1, 3, and 5 of the Executive Order and to reverse any ongoing actions related to these sections, as mandated by the court ruling. This situation underscores the importance of adhering to judicial orders in the context of executive actions affecting environmental risk management. For further inquiries, personnel are encouraged to contact the Office of General Counsel, and compliance with the court's order is critical until further judicial clarification is provided.
    Notice of Temporary Restraining Order
    Buyer not available
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a Notice of Temporary Restraining Order affecting all EPA contractors, following a court ruling in the case of New York et al. v. Trump. This order addresses the recent suspension of federal financial assistance as outlined in OMB Memorandum M-25-13, which has been challenged by several states on the grounds of violating the Administrative Procedure Act and constitutional provisions. The court's decision emphasizes the importance of maintaining compliance with congressionally appropriated funds to prevent disruption of essential services, and contractors are advised to direct any inquiries regarding the implications of this order to their respective Contracting Officers. For further details, the court's ruling and the full memorandum are attached for reference.
    Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) Funding Actions Pause on Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Contracts & Interagency Agreements (IAs)
    Buyer not available
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced a pause on all funding actions related to the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) as part of its compliance with President Trump's Executive Order aimed at "Unleashing American Energy." This suspension affects all contracts and interagency agreements, indicating a shift in the agency's focus towards energy production and regulatory compliance while it collaborates with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to review relevant processes and policies. The memorandum, dated January 28, 2025, is directed to all EPA contractors and IA recipients, emphasizing the importance of this pause in the context of ongoing funding initiatives. For further inquiries, contractors and recipients are encouraged to reach out to the EPA Office of Acquisition Solutions.
    Final Order in Wilmer Hale LLP v. Executive Office of the President, 25-cv-917
    Buyer not available
    The Department of Homeland Security is addressing compliance issues following a court ruling related to Executive Order 14250, which has been deemed unconstitutional. The court has permanently enjoined the implementation of this executive order, requiring all department personnel and contractors to disregard its directives and ensure adherence to the court's order. This situation underscores the importance of judicial oversight in executive actions and the protection of constitutional rights. For further inquiries regarding compliance with the court's order, interested parties should contact their contracting officer, as detailed guidance and a compliance report are expected to be provided within seven days of the ruling.
    2024-08-22 OIG Letter to EPA Contractors
    Buyer not available
    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Inspector General (OIG) has issued a special notice to remind EPA contractors of their responsibilities regarding the prevention and reporting of fraud, waste, and abuse in relation to EPA contracts. Contractors are required to adhere to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and the EPA Acquisition Regulation (EPAAR), which mandate integrity in business practices and the timely disclosure of credible evidence of legal violations. This communication is part of the OIG's initiative for 2024, designated as the "Year of Fighting Fraud," and emphasizes the importance of compliance and integrity in EPA contracting processes. Contractors are encouraged to report any suspected misconduct confidentially via the OIG Hotline or email, with the assurance of protection for whistleblowers under federal law.
    Notice Regarding Funding Pause - Temporary Restraining Order
    Buyer not available
    The Department of Homeland Security has issued a special notice regarding a temporary restraining order (TRO) that affects certain federal financial assistance programs, including grants. This TRO, stemming from a U.S. District Court ruling in the case of New York et al. v. Trump, prohibits federal agencies from pausing, freezing, or terminating federal awards based on the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Memorandum M-25-13 or related executive orders. The order underscores the potential irreparable harm to states dependent on federal funding for essential services and emphasizes the need to maintain the separation of powers. Further guidance from DHS is anticipated, and interested parties should refer to the attached court order for detailed information.
    F--EPA WATER RFP
    Buyer not available
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is soliciting proposals for its Water Assessment and Technical Emergency Response (WATER) Contract through a Request for Proposal (RFP). This procurement aims to engage qualified contractors to provide environmental consulting services, specifically focusing on water-related assessments and emergency response initiatives. The services sought are critical for ensuring effective management and response to water quality issues, which play a vital role in public health and environmental protection. Interested parties can reach out to Emily Mogg at Mogg.Emily@epa.gov or by phone at 415-972-3711 for further details regarding the solicitation and any associated deadlines.