Compliance with District Court Order Permanently Enjoining Implementation and Enforcement of Executive Order 14263 – "Addressing Risk from Susman Godfrey"
ID: ComplianceWithDistrictCourtOrderPermanentlyEnjoiningImplementationAndEnforcementOfExecutiveOrder14263AddressingRiskFromSusmanGType: Special Notice
Overview

Buyer

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Original Source

https://sam.gov/opp/84b03f7fc21649d49421be89d2a6c7b7/view
Timeline
    Description

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is issuing a special notice regarding compliance with a U.S. District Court order that permanently enjoins the implementation and enforcement of Executive Order 14263, titled "Addressing Risk from Susman Godfrey LLP." The court's ruling, which declared the executive order unconstitutional, mandates that the EPA and other federal agencies cease any actions related to the order, including rescinding guidance and reversing security clearance actions taken under it. This compliance is crucial to avoid potential contempt penalties, and all staff and contractors are instructed to disregard the executive order and maintain normal business interactions with Susman Godfrey LLP. For further inquiries, affected parties are encouraged to contact their contracting officer for guidance on adhering to the court's directives.

    Point(s) of Contact
    No information provided.
    Files
    Title
    Posted
    207 - Susman - 2025.06.26 - Permanent Injunction - Order.pdf
    The United States District Court for the District of Columbia issued an order regarding the case between Susman Godfrey LLP and the Executive Office of the President. The court denied the defendants' Motion to Dismiss and granted the plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment on several counts of the amended complaint. It declared Executive Order No. 14,263, aimed at "Addressing Risks from Susman Godfrey," unconstitutional and rendered it null and void. The order permanently enjoined all related federal departments and agencies from implementing or enforcing the said Executive Order and required them to reverse any actions taken under it. Furthermore, it mandated clear communication to all involved parties that the Executive Order is unlawful and must be disregarded. The court also directed the U.S. Department of Justice and other relevant agencies to cease investigations or requests linked to the Executive Order and to maintain normal business interactions with Susman Godfrey LLP. The order sets forth specified actions to ensure compliance and allows the court to retain jurisdiction for further enforcement or modifications.
    Compliance with District Court Order Permanently Enjoining Implementation and Enforcement of Executive Order 14263 Addressing Risk from Susman.pdf
    On April 9, 2025, President signed Executive Order 14263 aimed at addressing risks associated with Susman Godfrey LLP. However, on June 27, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled the executive order as unlawful and issued a permanent injunction, declaring it null and void. Per the court's directives, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) must cease any actions related to the executive order, including rescinding guidance, reversing any security clearance actions taken under it, and notifying all staff and contractors that the order is invalid. The agency is also instructed to halt any requests for disclosures regarding relationships with Susman Godfrey LLP. The Department of Justice is currently evaluating potential appeals of the ruling but emphasizes that immediate compliance with the court's order is essential to avoid contempt penalties. The memo concludes with an appeal for staff cooperation and encourages reaching out to appropriate channels for guidance.
    Executive Order.pdf
    Final Judgment Notice.pdf
    The document serves as a notice from Attorney General Pam Bondi to agencies affected by Executive Order 14263, concerning a recent court ruling in the case of Susman Godfrey LLP v. Executive Office of the President. The District Court ordered compliance with the terms established in the ruling as of June 27, 2025. The U.S. Department of Justice asserts the legality of the Executive Order and is exploring possible appeals against the court's decision. Until further court directives are issued, adherence to the court's ruling is mandatory, with non-compliance potentially leading to contempt penalties. This notice underscores the imperative for federal entities to align operations with legal requirements stemming from the executive order and court order, reinforcing governmental accountability and adherence to judicial decisions.
    Similar Opportunities
    Compliance with District Court order permanently enjoining implementation and enforcement of Executive Order 14230 – Addressing Risk from Perkins Coie LLP
    Buyer not available
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is issuing a special notice regarding compliance with a District Court order that permanently enjoins the implementation and enforcement of Executive Order 14230, which addressed alleged risks from Perkins Coie LLP. All EPA employees and contractors are directed to disregard the Executive Order and reverse any actions taken under it, following the court's ruling that deemed the Order unlawful for violating constitutional rights. This decision highlights the importance of adhering to judicial mandates in government operations, particularly concerning federal contracts and regulatory actions. For further inquiries, personnel are encouraged to contact their contracting officer or the Office of General Counsel for guidance on compliance measures.
    Compliance with Final Order in Jenner & Block, LLP v. Executive Office of the President
    Buyer not available
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a special notice regarding compliance with a Federal District Court order in the case of Jenner & Block, LLP v. Executive Office of the President. The court has permanently enjoined the enforcement of Executive Order 14246, which mandated federal officials to reverse any actions taken under its provisions, thereby requiring all EPA personnel and contractors to disregard this Executive Order. This ruling underscores the importance of adhering to legal obligations and navigating the regulatory landscape, as the EPA must comply with the court's directives to avoid penalties for contempt. For further guidance, recipients are instructed to contact their contracting officer or the Office of General Counsel as necessary.
    Compliance with Temporary Restraining Order on implementation and enforcement of Sections 1, 3, and 5 of Executive Order 14263 – “Addressing Risk from Susman Godfrey”
    Buyer not available
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is addressing compliance with a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) that halts the implementation and enforcement of specific sections of Executive Order 14263, titled “Addressing Risks from Susman Godfrey.” The directive, issued by Kimberly Y. Patrick, Deputy Assistant Administrator, instructs all EPA employees and contractors to disregard Sections 1, 3, and 5 of the Executive Order and to reverse any ongoing actions related to these sections, as mandated by the court ruling. This situation underscores the importance of adhering to judicial orders in the context of executive actions affecting environmental risk management. For further inquiries, personnel are encouraged to contact the Office of General Counsel, and compliance with the court's order is critical until further judicial clarification is provided.
    Compliance with Final Order in Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP v. Executive Office of the President
    Buyer not available
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is addressing compliance with a court ruling related to Executive Order 14250, which was deemed unconstitutional by the U.S. District Court. All EPA employees and contractors are instructed to disregard this Executive Order and reverse any actions taken in its implementation, following a permanent injunction issued on May 27, 2025. This ruling underscores the importance of adhering to judicial decisions within federal governance, ensuring that constitutional rights are upheld and that executive actions are subject to judicial review. For further inquiries, personnel are encouraged to contact their contracting officer or the Office of General Counsel as appropriate.
    Notice of Temporary Restraining Order
    Buyer not available
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a Notice of Temporary Restraining Order affecting all EPA contractors, following a court ruling in the case of New York et al. v. Trump. This order addresses the recent suspension of federal financial assistance as outlined in OMB Memorandum M-25-13, which has been challenged by several states on the grounds of violating the Administrative Procedure Act and constitutional provisions. The court's decision emphasizes the importance of maintaining compliance with congressionally appropriated funds to prevent disruption of essential services, and contractors are advised to direct any inquiries regarding the implications of this order to their respective Contracting Officers. For further details, the court's ruling and the full memorandum are attached for reference.
    Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) Funding Actions Pause on Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Contracts & Interagency Agreements (IAs)
    Buyer not available
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced a pause on all funding actions related to the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) as part of its compliance with President Trump's Executive Order aimed at "Unleashing American Energy." This suspension affects all contracts and interagency agreements, indicating a shift in the agency's focus towards energy production and regulatory compliance while it collaborates with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to review relevant processes and policies. The memorandum, dated January 28, 2025, is directed to all EPA contractors and IA recipients, emphasizing the importance of this pause in the context of ongoing funding initiatives. For further inquiries, contractors and recipients are encouraged to reach out to the EPA Office of Acquisition Solutions.
    Final Order in Wilmer Hale LLP v. Executive Office of the President, 25-cv-917
    Buyer not available
    The Department of Homeland Security is addressing compliance issues following a court ruling related to Executive Order 14250, which has been deemed unconstitutional. The court has permanently enjoined the implementation of this executive order, requiring all department personnel and contractors to disregard its directives and ensure adherence to the court's order. This situation underscores the importance of judicial oversight in executive actions and the protection of constitutional rights. For further inquiries regarding compliance with the court's order, interested parties should contact their contracting officer, as detailed guidance and a compliance report are expected to be provided within seven days of the ruling.
    2024-08-22 OIG Letter to EPA Contractors
    Buyer not available
    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Inspector General (OIG) has issued a special notice to remind EPA contractors of their responsibilities regarding the prevention and reporting of fraud, waste, and abuse in relation to EPA contracts. Contractors are required to adhere to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and the EPA Acquisition Regulation (EPAAR), which mandate integrity in business practices and the timely disclosure of credible evidence of legal violations. This communication is part of the OIG's initiative for 2024, designated as the "Year of Fighting Fraud," and emphasizes the importance of compliance and integrity in EPA contracting processes. Contractors are encouraged to report any suspected misconduct confidentially via the OIG Hotline or email, with the assurance of protection for whistleblowers under federal law.
    Notice Regarding Funding Pause - Temporary Restraining Order
    Buyer not available
    The Department of Homeland Security has issued a special notice regarding a temporary restraining order (TRO) that affects certain federal financial assistance programs, including grants. This TRO, stemming from a U.S. District Court ruling in the case of New York et al. v. Trump, prohibits federal agencies from pausing, freezing, or terminating federal awards based on the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Memorandum M-25-13 or related executive orders. The order underscores the potential irreparable harm to states dependent on federal funding for essential services and emphasizes the need to maintain the separation of powers. Further guidance from DHS is anticipated, and interested parties should refer to the attached court order for detailed information.
    F--Emergency Remedial Response Services (ERRS 6)
    Buyer not available
    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 1 is planning to issue a competitive small business set-aside solicitation for Emergency and Rapid Response Services (ERRS) to address time-critical removals and rapid remedial actions related to hazardous materials and environmental threats. The procurement aims to provide essential services in response to incidents involving oil, hazardous substances, and other pollutants, including those arising from acts of terrorism and natural disasters, within the states of Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont, and 10 Tribal Nations. This contract will be a performance-based indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (ID/IQ) type, with a maximum duration of 60 months, and is expected to be awarded based on a best value approach. Interested parties should monitor the Federal Business Opportunities website for the forthcoming solicitation number 68HE0125R0004 and direct any inquiries to Caitlin Rodgers at rodgers.caitlin@epa.gov or Ian Epstein at Epstein.Ian@epa.gov.