Notice of Court Order 2:25-cv-244-LK, ECF No. 233
ID: 225cv244LKECFNo_233Type: Special Notice
Overview

Buyer

ENERGY, DEPARTMENT OFENERGY, DEPARTMENT OF

Original Source

https://sam.gov/opp/6abf7bf89e62439986b548f2b2f4dc61/view
Timeline
    Description

    The Department of Energy has issued a special notice regarding a court order related to the case of Washington v. Trump, specifically concerning Executive Orders 14,187 and 14,168. The court has granted a preliminary injunction that restricts the enforcement of provisions affecting federal funding for health care entities that provide gender-affirming care, particularly in the states of Washington, Oregon, Minnesota, and Colorado. This ruling emphasizes the importance of safeguarding access to necessary medical care for vulnerable populations, particularly transgender youth, and highlights the limitations of executive power in relation to legislative authority over health and education funding. All federal agencies, employees, contractors, and grantees are required to comply with this injunction, and they are advised to consult their agency's Office of General Counsel for further clarification on its implications.

    Point(s) of Contact
    No information provided.
    Files
    Title
    Posted
    2025.03.05 - Washington v. Trump - Notice of Court Order.pdf
    The document informs federal agencies, employees, contractors, and grantees about a preliminary injunction issued in the case of Washington v. Trump regarding Executive Orders 14,187 and 14,168. The injunction, effective immediately, restricts the enforcement of specific provisions aimed at regulating federal funding for health care entities providing gender-affirming care and policies related to the treatment of children associated with chemical and surgical procedures. It specifically applies to the states of Washington, Oregon, Minnesota, and Colorado, prohibiting any actions that would enforce Section 4 of EO 14,187 or Sections 3(e) and 3(g) of EO 14,168. All parties are directed to comply with this new injunction, and for clarity on its implications, they are advised to consult their agency's Office of General Counsel. The document underscores the necessity for compliance with this court order while outlining the legal context of federal funding related to health care practices under scrutiny.
    233 - PI Order and Mem. Op..pdf
    The document outlines a court ruling from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington regarding a motion for a preliminary injunction involving two Executive Orders issued by President Trump. Plaintiffs, consisting of several states and physicians, challenged these orders, claiming they violate constitutional principles, particularly the separation of powers and equal protection rights. The first Executive Order disrupts federally funded research and education grants by requiring medical institutions to deny gender-affirming care, while the second asserts that only biological sex matters, disregarding gender identity. The court granted the motion in part, allowing a preliminary injunction against enforcing most sections of the orders but denying it regarding provisions on female genital mutilation. It highlighted the President's overreach in conditioning federal funds, which contravenes Congress's exclusive spending authority. The court found that the Executive Orders put vulnerable populations, particularly transgender youth, at risk by restricting access to necessary medical care, thereby emphasizing the likely success of the plaintiffs' constitutional claims. This ruling underscores the limits of executive power in contrast to legislative authority, particularly concerning health and education funding.
    Lifecycle
    Title
    Type
    Notice of Court Order 2:25-cv-244-LK, ECF No. 233
    Currently viewing
    Special Notice
    Similar Opportunities
    Compliance with District Court Order Permanently Enjoining Implementation and Enforcement of Executive Order 14263 – "Addressing Risk from Susman Godfrey"
    Environmental Protection Agency
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is issuing a special notice regarding compliance with a U.S. District Court order that permanently enjoins the implementation and enforcement of Executive Order 14263, titled "Addressing Risk from Susman Godfrey LLP." The court's ruling, which declared the executive order unconstitutional, mandates that the EPA and other federal agencies cease any actions related to the order, including rescinding guidance and reversing security clearance actions taken under it. This compliance is crucial to avoid potential contempt penalties, and all staff and contractors are instructed to disregard the executive order and maintain normal business interactions with Susman Godfrey LLP. For further inquiries, affected parties are encouraged to contact their contracting officer for guidance on adhering to the court's directives.
    Notice of Temporary Restraining Order
    Environmental Protection Agency
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a Notice of Temporary Restraining Order affecting all EPA contractors, following a court ruling in the case of New York et al. v. Trump. This order addresses the recent suspension of federal financial assistance as outlined in OMB Memorandum M-25-13, which has been challenged by several states on the grounds of violating the Administrative Procedure Act and constitutional provisions. The court's decision emphasizes the importance of maintaining compliance with congressionally appropriated funds to prevent disruption of essential services, and contractors are advised to direct any inquiries regarding the implications of this order to their respective Contracting Officers. For further details, the court's ruling and the full memorandum are attached for reference.
    Compliance with Final Order in Jenner & Block, LLP v. Executive Office of the President
    Environmental Protection Agency
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a special notice regarding compliance with a Federal District Court order in the case of Jenner & Block, LLP v. Executive Office of the President. The court has permanently enjoined the enforcement of Executive Order 14246, which mandated federal officials to reverse any actions taken under its provisions, thereby requiring all EPA personnel and contractors to disregard this Executive Order. This ruling underscores the importance of adhering to legal obligations and navigating the regulatory landscape, as the EPA must comply with the court's directives to avoid penalties for contempt. For further guidance, recipients are instructed to contact their contracting officer or the Office of General Counsel as necessary.
    Department of State (DOS) Preliminary Injunction Notice
    State, Department Of
    The Department of State (DOS) has issued a Special Notice regarding a Preliminary Injunction order related to the case of AIDS Vaccine Coalition v. U.S. Department of State and Global Health Council v. Trump. This injunction prohibits the enforcement of specific sections of a January 24 memorandum and mandates that the Restrained Defendants, including the DOS, USAID, and OMB, must not withhold payments or enforce stop-work orders for foreign assistance contracts, grants, or cooperative agreements that were active between January 20, 2025, and February 13, 2025. This order is significant as it ensures the availability of congressionally appropriated foreign aid funds and requires the defendants to notify all relevant recipients of contracts and agreements. Further guidance on the implementation of this injunction will be provided by the appropriate contracting and grant officers as it becomes available.
    Compliance with Final Order in Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP v. Executive Office of the President
    Environmental Protection Agency
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is addressing compliance with a court ruling related to Executive Order 14250, which was deemed unconstitutional by the U.S. District Court. All EPA employees and contractors are instructed to disregard this Executive Order and reverse any actions taken in its implementation, following a permanent injunction issued on May 27, 2025. This ruling underscores the importance of adhering to judicial decisions within federal governance, ensuring that constitutional rights are upheld and that executive actions are subject to judicial review. For further inquiries, personnel are encouraged to contact their contracting officer or the Office of General Counsel as appropriate.
    Compliance with District Court order permanently enjoining implementation and enforcement of Executive Order 14230 – Addressing Risk from Perkins Coie LLP
    Environmental Protection Agency
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is issuing a special notice regarding compliance with a District Court order that permanently enjoins the implementation and enforcement of Executive Order 14230, which addressed alleged risks from Perkins Coie LLP. All EPA employees and contractors are directed to disregard the Executive Order and reverse any actions taken under it, following the court's ruling that deemed the Order unlawful for violating constitutional rights. This decision highlights the importance of adhering to judicial mandates in government operations, particularly concerning federal contracts and regulatory actions. For further inquiries, personnel are encouraged to contact their contracting officer or the Office of General Counsel for guidance on compliance measures.
    Compliance with Temporary Restraining Order on implementation and enforcement of Sections 1, 3, and 5 of Executive Order 14263 – “Addressing Risk from Susman Godfrey”
    Environmental Protection Agency
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is addressing compliance with a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) that halts the implementation and enforcement of specific sections of Executive Order 14263, titled “Addressing Risks from Susman Godfrey.” The directive, issued by Kimberly Y. Patrick, Deputy Assistant Administrator, instructs all EPA employees and contractors to disregard Sections 1, 3, and 5 of the Executive Order and to reverse any ongoing actions related to these sections, as mandated by the court ruling. This situation underscores the importance of adhering to judicial orders in the context of executive actions affecting environmental risk management. For further inquiries, personnel are encouraged to contact the Office of General Counsel, and compliance with the court's order is critical until further judicial clarification is provided.
    Final Order in Wilmer Hale LLP v. Executive Office of the President, 25-cv-917
    Homeland Security, Department Of
    The Department of Homeland Security is addressing compliance issues following a court ruling related to Executive Order 14250, which has been deemed unconstitutional. The court has permanently enjoined the implementation of this executive order, requiring all department personnel and contractors to disregard its directives and ensure adherence to the court's order. This situation underscores the importance of judicial oversight in executive actions and the protection of constitutional rights. For further inquiries regarding compliance with the court's order, interested parties should contact their contracting officer, as detailed guidance and a compliance report are expected to be provided within seven days of the ruling.
    DoS Implementation of Trump-Vance Administration Policies Impacting Grants and Contracts
    State, Department Of
    The Department of State (DoS) is initiating a special notice regarding the implementation of recent executive orders from the Trump-Vance Administration that impact grants and contracts. The primary objective is to align DoS procedures and policies with these executive orders, which include directives to end certain government diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs and restore merit-based opportunities. This initiative is crucial for ensuring that the Department's operations reflect the current administration's agenda and priorities. Industry partners are advised that no immediate action is required unless contacted by their respective grants or contracting officers, and further guidance will be issued shortly. For more information, stakeholders should remain attentive to updates from the DoS.
    Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) Funding Actions Pause on Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Contracts & Interagency Agreements (IAs)
    Environmental Protection Agency
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced a pause on all funding actions related to the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) as part of its compliance with President Trump's Executive Order aimed at "Unleashing American Energy." This suspension affects all contracts and interagency agreements, indicating a shift in the agency's focus towards energy production and regulatory compliance while it collaborates with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to review relevant processes and policies. The memorandum, dated January 28, 2025, is directed to all EPA contractors and IA recipients, emphasizing the importance of this pause in the context of ongoing funding initiatives. For further inquiries, contractors and recipients are encouraged to reach out to the EPA Office of Acquisition Solutions.