The document details a federal court ruling where Susman Godfrey LLP successfully obtained a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) against the Executive Office of the President and associated defendants regarding Executive Order 14,236, issued on April 9, 2025. The court has ordered that Sections 1, 3, and 5 of the Executive Order be suspended and rescinded, effectively preventing the defendants from implementing any guidance or enforcement related to these sections. Specifically, the defendants are directed to inform individuals and entities affected by the order to disregard its provisions and are tasked with ensuring all actions related to it are halted. Compliance with this order is mandated by a deadline of April 16, 2025, for both status reports and updates on the steps taken to ensure adherence. The order remains in effect until further notice. This ruling reflects ongoing legal scrutiny regarding the impact of government executive actions on private entities and underscores the judicial system's role in addressing potential overreach by the executive branch.
On June 24, 2025, Kimberly Y. Patrick, Deputy Assistant Administrator for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), issued a directive in response to a temporary restraining order from the District Court regarding Executive Order 14263, titled “Addressing Risks from Susman Godfrey.” The court order mandates that the EPA cease the implementation and enforcement of certain sections of the Executive Order. Employees and contractors are instructed to disregard and reverse any ongoing actions related to Sections 1, 3, and 5 of the order. The Department of Justice is currently exploring potential appeals against the court’s ruling, emphasizing that non-compliance may lead to contempt penalties. Patrick urged all personnel to share this message within their organizations while encouraging inquiries directed to the Office of General Counsel for further guidance. This communication highlights the EPA's obligation to follow judicial orders amidst ongoing legal challenges surrounding executive directives related to environmental risk management. Compliance with the court's terms is critical until further judicial clarification is provided.
The document is an order from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia regarding the case between Susman Godfrey LLP, as the plaintiff, and the Executive Office of the President and others as defendants. It extends an injunction issued on April 15, 2025, by mutual agreement of both parties until a final judgment is made. Additionally, the document outlines an expedited schedule for filing dispositive motions: motions and opening briefs due by April 23, 2025, oppositions by April 30, 2025, and replies by May 5, 2025. A potential motions hearing is scheduled for May 8, 2025, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 21. This order reflects the court's management of case proceedings in compliance with federal rules and indicates ongoing legal processes related to governmental actions or policies.