Compliance with Temporary Restraining Order on implementation and enforcement of Sections 1, 3, and 5 of Executive Order 14263 – “Addressing Risk from Susman Godfrey”
ID: ComplianceWithTemporaryRestrainingOrderOnImplementationAndEnforcementOfSections1_3_And5OfExecutiveOrder14263Type: Special Notice
Overview

Buyer

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Timeline
    Description

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is addressing compliance with a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) that halts the implementation and enforcement of specific sections of Executive Order 14263, titled “Addressing Risks from Susman Godfrey.” The directive, issued by Kimberly Y. Patrick, Deputy Assistant Administrator, instructs all EPA employees and contractors to disregard Sections 1, 3, and 5 of the Executive Order and to reverse any ongoing actions related to these sections, as mandated by the court ruling. This situation underscores the importance of adhering to judicial orders in the context of executive actions affecting environmental risk management. For further inquiries, personnel are encouraged to contact the Office of General Counsel, and compliance with the court's order is critical until further judicial clarification is provided.

    Point(s) of Contact
    No information provided.
    Files
    Title
    Posted
    The document details a federal court ruling where Susman Godfrey LLP successfully obtained a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) against the Executive Office of the President and associated defendants regarding Executive Order 14,236, issued on April 9, 2025. The court has ordered that Sections 1, 3, and 5 of the Executive Order be suspended and rescinded, effectively preventing the defendants from implementing any guidance or enforcement related to these sections. Specifically, the defendants are directed to inform individuals and entities affected by the order to disregard its provisions and are tasked with ensuring all actions related to it are halted. Compliance with this order is mandated by a deadline of April 16, 2025, for both status reports and updates on the steps taken to ensure adherence. The order remains in effect until further notice. This ruling reflects ongoing legal scrutiny regarding the impact of government executive actions on private entities and underscores the judicial system's role in addressing potential overreach by the executive branch.
    On June 24, 2025, Kimberly Y. Patrick, Deputy Assistant Administrator for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), issued a directive in response to a temporary restraining order from the District Court regarding Executive Order 14263, titled “Addressing Risks from Susman Godfrey.” The court order mandates that the EPA cease the implementation and enforcement of certain sections of the Executive Order. Employees and contractors are instructed to disregard and reverse any ongoing actions related to Sections 1, 3, and 5 of the order. The Department of Justice is currently exploring potential appeals against the court’s ruling, emphasizing that non-compliance may lead to contempt penalties. Patrick urged all personnel to share this message within their organizations while encouraging inquiries directed to the Office of General Counsel for further guidance. This communication highlights the EPA's obligation to follow judicial orders amidst ongoing legal challenges surrounding executive directives related to environmental risk management. Compliance with the court's terms is critical until further judicial clarification is provided.
    The document is an order from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia regarding the case between Susman Godfrey LLP, as the plaintiff, and the Executive Office of the President and others as defendants. It extends an injunction issued on April 15, 2025, by mutual agreement of both parties until a final judgment is made. Additionally, the document outlines an expedited schedule for filing dispositive motions: motions and opening briefs due by April 23, 2025, oppositions by April 30, 2025, and replies by May 5, 2025. A potential motions hearing is scheduled for May 8, 2025, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 21. This order reflects the court's management of case proceedings in compliance with federal rules and indicates ongoing legal processes related to governmental actions or policies.
    Similar Opportunities
    Compliance with District Court Order Permanently Enjoining Implementation and Enforcement of Executive Order 14263 – "Addressing Risk from Susman Godfrey"
    Buyer not available
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is issuing a special notice regarding compliance with a U.S. District Court order that permanently enjoins the implementation and enforcement of Executive Order 14263, titled "Addressing Risk from Susman Godfrey LLP." The court's ruling, which declared the executive order unconstitutional, mandates that the EPA and other federal agencies cease any actions related to the order, including rescinding guidance and reversing security clearance actions taken under it. This compliance is crucial to avoid potential contempt penalties, and all staff and contractors are instructed to disregard the executive order and maintain normal business interactions with Susman Godfrey LLP. For further inquiries, affected parties are encouraged to contact their contracting officer for guidance on adhering to the court's directives.
    Compliance with District Court order permanently enjoining implementation and enforcement of Executive Order 14230 – Addressing Risk from Perkins Coie LLP
    Buyer not available
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is issuing a special notice regarding compliance with a District Court order that permanently enjoins the implementation and enforcement of Executive Order 14230, which addressed alleged risks from Perkins Coie LLP. All EPA employees and contractors are directed to disregard the Executive Order and reverse any actions taken under it, following the court's ruling that deemed the Order unlawful for violating constitutional rights. This decision highlights the importance of adhering to judicial mandates in government operations, particularly concerning federal contracts and regulatory actions. For further inquiries, personnel are encouraged to contact their contracting officer or the Office of General Counsel for guidance on compliance measures.
    Compliance with Final Order in Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP v. Executive Office of the President
    Buyer not available
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is addressing compliance with a court ruling related to Executive Order 14250, which was deemed unconstitutional by the U.S. District Court. All EPA employees and contractors are instructed to disregard this Executive Order and reverse any actions taken in its implementation, following a permanent injunction issued on May 27, 2025. This ruling underscores the importance of adhering to judicial decisions within federal governance, ensuring that constitutional rights are upheld and that executive actions are subject to judicial review. For further inquiries, personnel are encouraged to contact their contracting officer or the Office of General Counsel as appropriate.
    Compliance with Final Order in Jenner & Block, LLP v. Executive Office of the President
    Buyer not available
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a special notice regarding compliance with a Federal District Court order in the case of Jenner & Block, LLP v. Executive Office of the President. The court has permanently enjoined the enforcement of Executive Order 14246, which mandated federal officials to reverse any actions taken under its provisions, thereby requiring all EPA personnel and contractors to disregard this Executive Order. This ruling underscores the importance of adhering to legal obligations and navigating the regulatory landscape, as the EPA must comply with the court's directives to avoid penalties for contempt. For further guidance, recipients are instructed to contact their contracting officer or the Office of General Counsel as necessary.
    Notice of Temporary Restraining Order
    Buyer not available
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a Notice of Temporary Restraining Order affecting all EPA contractors, following a court ruling in the case of New York et al. v. Trump. This order addresses the recent suspension of federal financial assistance as outlined in OMB Memorandum M-25-13, which has been challenged by several states on the grounds of violating the Administrative Procedure Act and constitutional provisions. The court's decision emphasizes the importance of maintaining compliance with congressionally appropriated funds to prevent disruption of essential services, and contractors are advised to direct any inquiries regarding the implications of this order to their respective Contracting Officers. For further details, the court's ruling and the full memorandum are attached for reference.
    Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) Funding Actions Pause on Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Contracts & Interagency Agreements (IAs)
    Buyer not available
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced a pause on all funding actions related to the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) as part of its compliance with President Trump's Executive Order aimed at "Unleashing American Energy." This suspension affects all contracts and interagency agreements, indicating a shift in the agency's focus towards energy production and regulatory compliance while it collaborates with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to review relevant processes and policies. The memorandum, dated January 28, 2025, is directed to all EPA contractors and IA recipients, emphasizing the importance of this pause in the context of ongoing funding initiatives. For further inquiries, contractors and recipients are encouraged to reach out to the EPA Office of Acquisition Solutions.
    Final Order in Wilmer Hale LLP v. Executive Office of the President, 25-cv-917
    Buyer not available
    The Department of Homeland Security is addressing compliance issues following a court ruling related to Executive Order 14250, which has been deemed unconstitutional. The court has permanently enjoined the implementation of this executive order, requiring all department personnel and contractors to disregard its directives and ensure adherence to the court's order. This situation underscores the importance of judicial oversight in executive actions and the protection of constitutional rights. For further inquiries regarding compliance with the court's order, interested parties should contact their contracting officer, as detailed guidance and a compliance report are expected to be provided within seven days of the ruling.
    2024-08-22 OIG Letter to EPA Contractors
    Buyer not available
    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Inspector General (OIG) has issued a special notice to remind EPA contractors of their responsibilities regarding the prevention and reporting of fraud, waste, and abuse in relation to EPA contracts. Contractors are required to adhere to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and the EPA Acquisition Regulation (EPAAR), which mandate integrity in business practices and the timely disclosure of credible evidence of legal violations. This communication is part of the OIG's initiative for 2024, designated as the "Year of Fighting Fraud," and emphasizes the importance of compliance and integrity in EPA contracting processes. Contractors are encouraged to report any suspected misconduct confidentially via the OIG Hotline or email, with the assurance of protection for whistleblowers under federal law.
    Notice Regarding Funding Pause - Temporary Restraining Order
    Buyer not available
    The Department of Homeland Security has issued a special notice regarding a temporary restraining order (TRO) that affects certain federal financial assistance programs, including grants. This TRO, stemming from a U.S. District Court ruling in the case of New York et al. v. Trump, prohibits federal agencies from pausing, freezing, or terminating federal awards based on the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Memorandum M-25-13 or related executive orders. The order underscores the potential irreparable harm to states dependent on federal funding for essential services and emphasizes the need to maintain the separation of powers. Further guidance from DHS is anticipated, and interested parties should refer to the attached court order for detailed information.
    F--EPA WATER RFP
    Buyer not available
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is soliciting proposals for its Water Assessment and Technical Emergency Response (WATER) Contract through a Request for Proposal (RFP). This procurement aims to engage qualified contractors to provide environmental consulting services, specifically focusing on water-related assessments and emergency response initiatives. The services sought are critical for ensuring effective management and response to water quality issues, which play a vital role in public health and environmental protection. Interested parties can reach out to Emily Mogg at Mogg.Emily@epa.gov or by phone at 415-972-3711 for further details regarding the solicitation and any associated deadlines.