The National Park Service has announced funding through the FY2024 Paul Bruhn Historic Revitalization Subgrant Program, aimed at rehabilitating historic properties to promote economic development in rural communities. This initiative offers a total estimated funding of $10 million, with grants ranging from $200,000 to $750,000 for eligible applicants, including state governments, tribes, non-profits, and local agencies. The program encourages projects that honor America’s historical and cultural heritage, in alignment with the upcoming celebration of America’s 250th anniversary. Applications must adhere to strict submission guidelines via Grants.gov, ensuring all required documentation is submitted by the deadline of August 21, 2025. The review process evaluates the need, feasibility, sustainability, and objectives of each proposal, granting up to 100 total points. Operating costs associated with these projects are capped at 25%, and the program does not support new construction, acquisitions, or lobbying efforts. Recipients must comply with various federal regulations and agree to a preservation easement to ensure the ongoing maintenance of the funded historic properties. This program highlights the government's commitment to preserving America's heritage while stimulating local economies.

The document provides instructions for completing a Budget Justification Worksheet as part of federal grant applications, specifically under a program funded by the Historic Preservation Fund. It outlines how applicants should categorize their project costs into nine sections, including personnel, fringe benefits, travel, equipment, supplies, consultant fees, construction costs, other expenses, and indirect charges. Each cost must be reasonable, eligible, and justified in the project description, with a maximum limit of 25% of the total project cost allowable for administrative and indirect costs. Applicants are advised to detail how each component supports the project and ensure all budget information aligns with required forms (SF-424A and SF-424C). The worksheet is structured to ensure clarity and accountability in grant management and funding allocation, with particular attention to matching funds and competitive factors in budget considerations. Overall, the document serves to guide applicants on effectively presenting their financial requirements for grant funding.

The Budget Justification Worksheet for Historic Preservation Fund Grants outlines the requirements for developing a detailed budget that distinguishes administrative from program costs while justifying their relevance to the project. Administrative costs, capped at 25% of the overall budget, include necessary expenses for managing the grant, such as salaries and overhead functions. The worksheet covers various budget categories: Personnel, Fringe Benefits, Travel, Equipment, Supplies and Materials, Contractual/Consultant Fees, Construction/Conservation expenses, and Others, specifying the need for detailed itemization and justification for all expenses. Indirect charges require adherence to federally-negotiated rates, with the potential for a De Minimis rate if needed. Additionally, it includes a questionnaire component to ensure compliance with financial management standards, detail past funding, and confirm the absence of funding overlaps. This document serves as a guideline for applicants to submit clear, justified budgets aligned with federal and state funding stipulations, ensuring effective allocation of historic preservation resources.

The document outlines the requirements for submitting a Project Abstract Summary as part of federal grant applications. It emphasizes the necessity for accurate, complete information in various fields, including the Funding Opportunity Number, CFDA number, applicant organization, project title, and a succinct project summary. The project summary must detail the award's purpose, specific activities, performance goals, and the expected beneficiaries. A sample response is provided for guidance. Additionally, it specifies that applicants must adhere to new requirements effective from December 1, 2021, to ensure detailed project descriptions are publicly accessible. The aim is to enhance transparency regarding federal financial assistance, requiring concise articulation of project components to foster public understanding while avoiding sensitive data disclosure. Overall, this document serves as a guideline for potential grant applicants to create an effective Project Abstract Summary for their funding requests.

The document outlines guidelines for the inclusion of photographs in applications related to projects funded or overseen by the National Park Service. Applicants must attach high-quality images that depict current conditions and threats to the historic sites or resources involved. At a minimum, one representative photo per elevation and a comprehensive overall photo are required, alongside captions and photo credits for each image. Both color and black-and-white photos are acceptable, and the images should illustrate the community as well as the significant resources impacted by the project. Furthermore, all submitted materials, including photographs, become the property of the National Park Service for potential reproduction, ensuring appropriate credit is given. For additional guidance, applicants can refer to the provided link for tips and FAQs. This document serves as a crucial resource in the context of government Requests for Proposals (RFPs) and federal grants, facilitating the documentation process for project submissions.

The Program Description Worksheet for the Paul Bruhn Historic Revitalization Grants (PBHRG) outlines the necessary information to apply for funding aimed at revitalizing historic properties. It requires applicants to provide details such as their organization's name, location, property descriptions, ownership types (private, public, educational, nonprofit), and whether properties are listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The worksheet also emphasizes the need to articulate program objectives, the urgency of the revitalization need, feasibility including timeline considerations, and sustainability of the project. Applicants must limit each section to 6,000 characters, ensuring that key points are clearly communicated and concise. This structured approach aims to streamline the application process while emphasizing the importance of historic preservation and revitalization within communities.