The document is a Change Map Template for a project aimed at improving responses to sexual violence in COUNTRY X through the establishment of Sexual Assault Response Teams (SARTs). Funded by the International Narcotics and Law Enforcement (INL), the project runs from January 15, 2023, to January 31, 2025. Its main goal is to ensure that victims of sexual violence gain access to justice, support services, and effective remedies, aligning with international standards. The project features several key objectives, including creating a fully functional national mechanism for responding to sexual assault cases, enhancing the knowledge and skills of multidisciplinary teams, raising awareness to encourage reporting, and improving cooperation between justice and law enforcement sectors. Each objective includes specific indicators for success, such as the number of trained professionals, the availability of resources, and the effectiveness of awareness campaigns. Activities to achieve these goals involve organizing training sessions, workshops, sharing best practices with U.S. teams, and conducting awareness-raising campaigns aimed at combating stereotypes related to sexual violence. The comprehensive approach integrates technical assistance to improve national practices, promote victim reporting, and enhance collaboration among relevant stakeholders in the justice system.

The FY2025 Budget Narrative Template outlines the financial framework for a project, detailing personnel, travel, equipment, supplies, contractual obligations, and indirect costs. Personnel includes a project manager and a finance manager, with illustrative salaries and fringe benefits based on established rates. Travel expenses include airfare and lodging for project-related activities abroad. Equipment purchases include a machine for specific project purposes and laptops for staff, while supplies cover workshop materials necessary for participant engagement. The document notes a subgrant with a local NGO which details budget allocations for salaries, transportation, and supplies for numerous workshops. Direct costs amount to $50,000, while indirect costs, calculated with a negotiated rate of 35%, add $15,750, bringing total project costs to $65,750. The structured nature of the document aligns with standards for federal grants and RFPs, ensuring clarity on budgetary requirements and compliance to facilitate funding approvals. This summary highlights the project’s financial structure while emphasizing adherence to guidelines essential for federal funding applications.

The FY2025 INL Applicant Pre-Award Risk Survey is a comprehensive evaluation tool utilized by federal agencies to assess organizations seeking grants or contracts. The document is structured into several sections focusing on general information, internal controls, accounting systems, budgetary controls, audits, sub-recipient management, consultants, purchases, personnel, and travel. Each section contains a series of yes/no questions and requests for supporting documentation, designed to evaluate the applicant's compliance with federal regulations, internal policies, and financial management practices. Key considerations include verifying the organization's legal status, tax compliance, past federal funding experience, internal control systems, and the adequacy of financial reporting procedures. The survey also examines budgeting strategies, audit frequency, and the management of sub-award relationships. Overall, the document aims to ensure that applicant organizations are equipped with robust governance and financial accountability measures, ultimately facilitating responsible use of federal funds. This risk assessment plays a crucial role in promoting transparency and proper management of federal grants and contracts within the governmental framework.

The document outlines a summary budget form for an unspecified project, detailing costs associated with personnel, benefits, travel, equipment, supplies, contractual obligations, and other direct costs. It includes sections for the organization name, project title, dates, and total costs, emphasizing the breakdown of both direct and indirect costs, including requested federal funds and any cost share from the applicant. The budget structure is organized into line items, with placeholder amounts indicating that total costs will auto-fill from a detailed grant budget template. Key areas include personnel costs broken down into US-based and field personnel, travel costs for both international and domestic journeys, and provisions for equipment and supplies. Indirect costs are noted, adhering to established NICRA rates. The document serves a functional purpose for applicants to outline anticipated expenses and required funding for proposed initiatives, aligning with federal and state grant applications. The clearly defined structure aids in ensuring compliance with grant requirements while facilitating the review process for funding authorities.

The document serves as a Performance Indicator Reference Sheet, detailing guidelines for developing and utilizing performance indicators in government-funded projects. The main objective is to gather data to assess the effectiveness of initiatives focused on capacity building across various sectors, particularly in law enforcement and judiciary. Key elements include outlining goals, objectives, and sub-objectives associated with each indicator, identifying data sources, defining data collection methodologies, and clarifying reporting frequencies. Disaggregation of data by variables such as sex and geographic location is emphasized for detailed analysis. Known data limitations and the level of effort for data collection are addressed, ensuring transparency and accuracy in performance reporting. The appendix provides insights on best practices for developing valid outcome indicators, stressing the importance of measuring results rather than just outputs. This comprehensive framework is essential for effective monitoring and evaluation, helping to ensure accountability for federal grants and RFPs by providing a systematic approach to understanding project performance and outcomes.

The INL Change Map Template for FY23 serves as a tool to connect project work plans with monitoring plans through clearly defined goals, objectives, and indicators. Developed by the International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL), it outlines the specific changes projects aim to achieve and how these changes will be monitored. The template includes sections for project information, strategic policy alignment, and an organized format for goals, objectives, sub-objectives, activities, and indicators. The document emphasizes the importance of “change” by requiring clear and specific goals that reflect the expected outcomes rather than mere activities. It instructs implementing partners to draft initial maps, which INL staff will review and finalize. It also highlights the necessity of strategic alignment with broader INL objectives and warns against the inclusion of excessive indicators that may obscure meaningful project progress. Additionally, the template stresses the significance of clarity in definitions and consistent terminology to avoid ambiguity in project expectations and success criteria. Clear goals and objectives are essential for understanding project effectiveness, ensuring taxpayer funds contribute to tangible results in combatting transnational crime and improving rule of law. This structured approach is crucial for maintaining accountability and measuring impact in government-funded initiatives.

The U.S. Department of State's Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL) has issued a Notice of Funding Opportunity designed to advance anti-corruption efforts in Peru, with a total funding availability of $800,000. This initiative targets civil society organizations (CSOs) to enhance their ability to detect and combat corruption, thereby strengthening democratic institutions and supporting rule of law in the country. Applicants eligible to apply include invited U.S. and foreign NGOs and educational institutions, with grants ranging from $150,000 to $300,000. The project aims to empower Peruvian CSOs through training, development of toolkits, media partnerships, and public awareness campaigns. Emphasis is placed on reaching diverse participants beyond Lima, including marginalized groups. The project duration is between 12 to 24 months, with expected outcomes including increased accountability and citizen oversight. Applications must be submitted via www.grants.gov by the specified deadlines, demonstrating adherence to INL's technical and programmatic evaluation criteria, which prioritize insightful problem analysis, feasible implementation plans, and a clear focus on gender equity and inclusion. This funding opportunity represents a concerted U.S. effort to combat systemic corruption and enhance governance in Peru.

The document presents a risk assessment for a project aimed at establishing political think tanks in countries with restrictive political environments. It outlines various risks associated with civil society partners, including harassment, restricted operations, and biased perceptions by government officials. The assessment categorizes risks into programmatic and financial, with a focus on their impacts and likelihood. Key risks include government monitoring of civil society organizations (CSOs), reluctance of government officials to engage on sensitive issues, changes in political landscapes following elections, and potential delays in funding transfers. Risk mitigation strategies are detailed, such as enhancing security for partners, advocating for direct government engagement, adjusting work plans based on political shifts, and providing training to local partners on financial management. The main purpose of the document is to ensure comprehensive planning and risk management for the successful implementation of the initiative, highlighting the importance of adaptability and proactive engagement with local stakeholders and authorities. This risk assessment is essential for eligible applicants seeking federal grants and participation in government RFPs, emphasizing the need for strategic responses to potential challenges in politically sensitive environments.