The "Current and Pending (Other) Support Common Form," effective November 1, 2023, outlines requirements for disclosing support information by senior/key personnel involved in federally funded research projects. This information is critical for assessing any potential conflicts of commitment and ensuring no overlap in scientific and budgetary resources between current proposals and active projects.
Researchers must disclose all proposals and active projects, including those for in-kind contributions valued over $5,000, detailing aspects such as project titles, statuses, funding sources, and person-months devoted. Importantly, they are also required to report activities tied to foreign governments or related talent recruitment programs, aligning with NSPM-33 guidelines that promote transparency.
The document mandates avoidance of personal information disclosure and emphasizes the need for certifications regarding the accuracy of the reported information. Overall, this form serves to maintain the integrity and accountability of research funding within the federal landscape, providing a structured approach for declaring existing and pending supports.
The US Geological Survey (USGS) is issuing a funding opportunity through a Cooperative Agreement with a CESU Partner to conduct the "State of Washington Dreissenid Risk Assessment Project." The project aims to develop a standardized risk assessment model for invasive dreissenid mussels within Washington's watersheds, particularly in the Columbia River Basin. This model is designed to help the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife allocate resources effectively for monitoring and managing the threat posed by these invasive species. The recipient must adapt an existing Missouri River Basin model and incorporate watershed-specific data.
The award will have a budget of $126,900 for one year and is restricted to partners in the Californian Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit. Detailed application requirements include organizational information, project objectives, methodologies, and a comprehensive budget. Proposals will be evaluated on relevance, clarity of objectives and methodology, budget justification, and previous performance. Awarded recipients must provide annual progress reports and a final technical report. Furthermore, compliance with federal integrity standards and specific publication requirements is mandatory to ensure project transparency and accountability to the public.