Notice of Court Order & Temporary Restraining Order
Type: Special Notice
Overview

Buyer

JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT OFFEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Original Source

https://sam.gov/opp/dd2272d502104b40b76bc59a49ed7db3/view
Timeline
    Description

    The Department of Justice, specifically the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), has issued a special notice regarding a temporary restraining order (TRO) related to a case challenging a pause on certain federal financial assistance as outlined in OMB Memorandum M-25-13. The TRO prohibits federal agencies from pausing or blocking funding based on the rescinded OMB memorandum or related executive orders, emphasizing the importance of compliance with statutory obligations to ensure the continued flow of critical funds for state services in sectors such as health and education. This order is a response to claims that the funding pause violates the Administrative Procedure Act and the U.S. Constitution, with a hearing date for a preliminary injunction to be set as litigation progresses. For inquiries regarding contracts, parties are advised to contact their Contracting Officer or reach out to IndustryOutreach@fbi.gov by the specified deadline of February 3, 2025, at 9 am.

    Point(s) of Contact
    No information provided.
    Files
    Title
    Posted
    RI Temporary Restraining Order Notice 01-31-2025.pdf
    The document communicates a temporary restraining order (TRO) regarding the federal financial assistance pause prompted by an Office of Management and Budget (OMB) memorandum and executive orders from the President. The states involved in the case, led by New York, assert that this pause violates the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and the U.S. Constitution by unilaterally obstructing the disbursement of congressionally appropriated funds. The court found sufficient likelihood that the plaintiffs would succeed on the merits of their claims, indicating that immediate irreparable harm would occur without a TRO. Key stipulations prohibit federal agencies from pausing or blocking funding based on the rescinded OMB Memo or related executive orders, emphasizing compliance with statutory obligations. The order highlights the continued critical role of these funds for state services across various sectors such as health and education. Moreover, it indicates that despite the OMB's rescission of the memorandum, the directive's substance persists, necessitating the TRO to maintain operations pending further legal proceedings. The court will set a hearing date for a preliminary injunction as litigation proceeds.
    Lifecycle
    Title
    Type
    Notice of Court Order & Temporary Restraining Order
    Currently viewing
    Special Notice
    Similar Opportunities
    Notice of Temporary Restraining Order
    Buyer not available
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a Notice of Temporary Restraining Order affecting all EPA contractors, following a court ruling in the case of New York et al. v. Trump. This order addresses the recent suspension of federal financial assistance as outlined in OMB Memorandum M-25-13, which has been challenged by several states on the grounds of violating the Administrative Procedure Act and constitutional provisions. The court's decision emphasizes the importance of maintaining compliance with congressionally appropriated funds to prevent disruption of essential services, and contractors are advised to direct any inquiries regarding the implications of this order to their respective Contracting Officers. For further details, the court's ruling and the full memorandum are attached for reference.
    Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) Funding Actions Pause on Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Contracts & Interagency Agreements (IAs)
    Buyer not available
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced a pause on all funding actions related to the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) as part of its compliance with President Trump's Executive Order aimed at "Unleashing American Energy." This suspension affects all contracts and interagency agreements, indicating a shift in the agency's focus towards energy production and regulatory compliance while it collaborates with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to review relevant processes and policies. The memorandum, dated January 28, 2025, is directed to all EPA contractors and IA recipients, emphasizing the importance of this pause in the context of ongoing funding initiatives. For further inquiries, contractors and recipients are encouraged to reach out to the EPA Office of Acquisition Solutions.
    Department of State (DOS) Preliminary Injunction Notice
    Buyer not available
    The Department of State (DOS) has issued a Special Notice regarding a Preliminary Injunction order related to the case of AIDS Vaccine Coalition v. U.S. Department of State and Global Health Council v. Trump. This injunction prohibits the enforcement of specific sections of a January 24 memorandum and mandates that the Restrained Defendants, including the DOS, USAID, and OMB, must not withhold payments or enforce stop-work orders for foreign assistance contracts, grants, or cooperative agreements that were active between January 20, 2025, and February 13, 2025. This order is significant as it ensures the availability of congressionally appropriated foreign aid funds and requires the defendants to notify all relevant recipients of contracts and agreements. Further guidance on the implementation of this injunction will be provided by the appropriate contracting and grant officers as it becomes available.
    Compliance with Temporary Restraining Order on implementation and enforcement of Sections 1, 3, and 5 of Executive Order 14263 – “Addressing Risk from Susman Godfrey”
    Buyer not available
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is addressing compliance with a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) that halts the implementation and enforcement of specific sections of Executive Order 14263, titled “Addressing Risks from Susman Godfrey.” The directive, issued by Kimberly Y. Patrick, Deputy Assistant Administrator, instructs all EPA employees and contractors to disregard Sections 1, 3, and 5 of the Executive Order and to reverse any ongoing actions related to these sections, as mandated by the court ruling. This situation underscores the importance of adhering to judicial orders in the context of executive actions affecting environmental risk management. For further inquiries, personnel are encouraged to contact the Office of General Counsel, and compliance with the court's order is critical until further judicial clarification is provided.
    Notification of Continuing Appropriations
    Buyer not available
    The Department of the Treasury has issued a Special Notice regarding the Notification of Continuing Appropriations, which affects contract services due to the recent government shutdown. The appropriations under Public Law 119–4 have been amended to extend funding through January 30, 2026, allowing previously suspended contract services to resume. This resolution is crucial for maintaining operations within the Treasury and its associated agencies, including the Internal Revenue Service and the Bureau of the Fiscal Service. For inquiries regarding contract status, stakeholders can reach out via designated email addresses provided for each bureau, and updates will be available on the Treasury's official website and SAM.gov.
    Compliance with District Court Order Permanently Enjoining Implementation and Enforcement of Executive Order 14263 – "Addressing Risk from Susman Godfrey"
    Buyer not available
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is issuing a special notice regarding compliance with a U.S. District Court order that permanently enjoins the implementation and enforcement of Executive Order 14263, titled "Addressing Risk from Susman Godfrey LLP." The court's ruling, which declared the executive order unconstitutional, mandates that the EPA and other federal agencies cease any actions related to the order, including rescinding guidance and reversing security clearance actions taken under it. This compliance is crucial to avoid potential contempt penalties, and all staff and contractors are instructed to disregard the executive order and maintain normal business interactions with Susman Godfrey LLP. For further inquiries, affected parties are encouraged to contact their contracting officer for guidance on adhering to the court's directives.
    Compliance with Final Order in Jenner & Block, LLP v. Executive Office of the President
    Buyer not available
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a special notice regarding compliance with a Federal District Court order in the case of Jenner & Block, LLP v. Executive Office of the President. The court has permanently enjoined the enforcement of Executive Order 14246, which mandated federal officials to reverse any actions taken under its provisions, thereby requiring all EPA personnel and contractors to disregard this Executive Order. This ruling underscores the importance of adhering to legal obligations and navigating the regulatory landscape, as the EPA must comply with the court's directives to avoid penalties for contempt. For further guidance, recipients are instructed to contact their contracting officer or the Office of General Counsel as necessary.
    Compliance with District Court order permanently enjoining implementation and enforcement of Executive Order 14230 – Addressing Risk from Perkins Coie LLP
    Buyer not available
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is issuing a special notice regarding compliance with a District Court order that permanently enjoins the implementation and enforcement of Executive Order 14230, which addressed alleged risks from Perkins Coie LLP. All EPA employees and contractors are directed to disregard the Executive Order and reverse any actions taken under it, following the court's ruling that deemed the Order unlawful for violating constitutional rights. This decision highlights the importance of adhering to judicial mandates in government operations, particularly concerning federal contracts and regulatory actions. For further inquiries, personnel are encouraged to contact their contracting officer or the Office of General Counsel for guidance on compliance measures.
    Senior Procurement Executive Message to the Department of State Contractor and Federal Assistance Community on the Lapse in Appropriations
    Buyer not available
    The Department of State is issuing a special notice regarding the impact of a lapse in appropriations that began on October 1, 2025, affecting contracts and federal assistance awards, including those from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). This guidance outlines the implications of the Antideficiency Act, which prohibits the incurrence of obligations without enacted appropriations, potentially leading to cancellations, postponements, or terminations of planned procurements and grants, as well as delays in payments. Contractors and recipients are advised to continue complying with all contract terms unless formally notified otherwise, and the Department will communicate resumption plans once a Continuing Resolution or full-year appropriation is enacted. For further inquiries, contractors and recipients should refer to their respective contracting or grant officers.
    Compliance with Final Order in Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP v. Executive Office of the President
    Buyer not available
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is addressing compliance with a court ruling related to Executive Order 14250, which was deemed unconstitutional by the U.S. District Court. All EPA employees and contractors are instructed to disregard this Executive Order and reverse any actions taken in its implementation, following a permanent injunction issued on May 27, 2025. This ruling underscores the importance of adhering to judicial decisions within federal governance, ensuring that constitutional rights are upheld and that executive actions are subject to judicial review. For further inquiries, personnel are encouraged to contact their contracting officer or the Office of General Counsel as appropriate.