The document outlines the Combined Synopsis/Solicitation N6470925Q0026 for firefighting equipment to be acquired by the Strategic Weapons Facility, Atlantic (SWFLANT). It describes the request for quotation (RFQ) for specific items such as hoses, nozzles, and valves, emphasizing that only brand-name products will be accepted. The solicitation is set aside for small businesses, adhering to the FAR guidelines, and requires quotations by April 16, 2025. Offerors must provide a firm-fixed-price quote inclusive of all costs and necessary specifications, confirming authorized reseller status. The evaluation criteria are based on the lowest-priced technically acceptable (LPTA) quote, ensuring all required items are included and meet specifications. Delivery is expected to the Naval Submarine Base in Kings Bay, Georgia, within 30 days post-contract award, and all communications must be sent via a designated email address. Non-compliance with specified conditions could render a quote unacceptable, reinforcing strict adherence to procurement regulations. This solicitation aids the government in addressing its firefighting needs while ensuring transparency and accountability in the procurement process.
The United States Department of the Navy's Strategic Weapons Facility, Atlantic seeks approval for a brand name justification to procure essential firefighting equipment, totaling an estimated value of $33,294.19. This equipment consists of various fire hoses and nozzles from specific brands, ensuring compatibility with existing firefighting gear to avoid operational failures, especially at the Explosive Handling Wharf. The justification cites FAR 13.106(b)(1)(ii), stating that only these particular brands will ensure proper functionality with current equipment. Market research indicates that mandatory sources could not fulfill all requirements, prompting an RFQ to be posted on sam.gov for seven days. The document emphasizes the importance of specific thread patterns in firefighting equipment compatibility, noting that substitutions could prevent proper connection and functionality. With no sources expressing interest in competing bids, the agency remains committed to monitoring the market for potential options. The justification concludes with certifications from technical personnel and the contracting officer, affirming the accuracy and necessity of the procurement.