The document outlines the process for submitting Source Approval Requests (SARs) to the Department of Defense (DoD) regarding national stock numbers (NSNs). For NSNs linked to open solicitations, submissions must be sent directly to the designated buyer. Conversely, SARs for NSNs without open solicitations must be transmitted electronically via the DoD SAFE site, eliminating the need for physical media. To initiate the submission, interested parties should email DLA Aviation to request a drop-off link, including relevant identification details such as the CAGE code and NSN.
Additionally, the document notes that SARs are not guaranteed processing if deemed cost-ineffective due to low demand for the item, urging applicants to consult the DLA Supplier Requirements Visibility Application for demand forecasts. The review process may take over 180 days, culminating in formal notification of the decision. The information emphasizes the shift to a more efficient electronic submission method, ensuring timely and streamlined communication within the procurement process.
The Aviation Source Approval and Management Handbook outlines policies and procedures for the approval and management of sources supplying Critical Safety Items (CSIs) in aviation. The document includes guidelines on types of sources that can be approved, the responsibilities of procuring activities, and the process for Source Approval Requests (SARs). Key sections discuss source identification criteria including original equipment manufacturers, fully-licensed repair facilities, and approved distributors, establishing strict compliance for traceability and technical requirements.
The handbook emphasizes risk management in SAR submissions, quality assurance, and testing requirements to ensure all sources can consistently deliver conforming items. It defines the roles of various agencies, including Integrated Material Managers and cognizant Engineering Support Activities (ESA), in managing source approvals. Furthermore, it addresses issues concerning surpluses, reverse engineering, and the implications of governmental regulations such as the Competition in Contracting Act and Federal Acquisition Regulations. This structured approach aims to enhance safety, ensure airworthiness, and promote competition among sources while minimizing risk and guaranteeing compliance with established standards.