This document outlines the Frequently Asked Questions for international entities registering in SAM.gov, a mandatory step for receiving federal assistance awards. It explains that while NCAGE codes are primarily required for Department of Defense (DoD) awards, recent changes mean entities not seeking DoD funding are exempt from this necessity. Entities must obtain a Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) during registration, which requires accurate information and prompt responses to inquiries to avoid delays. Registration includes an entity validation process, now using a new service provider rather than Dun and Bradstreet. The document stresses the importance of annual renewal of registrations to maintain eligibility for payments and new awards. Additionally, it details the necessary documentation for validating legal names, addresses, and incorporation details, highlighting common pitfalls like mismatched information that can cause delays. For subrecipients, a full registration is not required unless they are also federal award recipients. Lastly, instructions for address mismatches or issues with login access are provided, ensuring entities can navigate the registration process efficiently. This guidance is critical for organizations looking to engage with U.S. federal funding mechanisms, ensuring compliance and successful applications for grants and contracts.

The U.S. Department of State's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (DRL) provides comprehensive instructions for submitting grant proposals, focusing on eligibility and application requirements. Eligible applicants include non-profit organizations, public international organizations, educational institutions, and for-profit entities, although preference is given to non-profits. The document outlines necessary registrations on SAM.gov and introduces the distinct application systems: MyGrants and Grants.gov. Key elements of proposals include formatted application documents, project narratives detailing goals and objectives, budget guidelines, and various analysis requirements, such as gender and inclusion assessments. The proposal should also address risk analysis, monitoring and evaluation, integration of lessons from past projects, and environmental impact assessments. A systematic approach to the budget is critical, necessitating detailed line-item budgets and justifications for each cost associated with the proposed activities, while emphasizing compliance with federal regulations and guidelines. Applications lacking mandated components risk being deemed technically eligible. DRL's process underscores a rigorous adherence to transparency, inclusiveness, and the monitoring of project impacts on communities, aiming to strengthen democracy and human rights globally.