Soldier Virtual Training (SVT), Weapons Skills Development (WSD) and Joint Fires Trainer (JFT)

The Army Contracting Command – Aberdeen Proving Ground (ACC-APG), Orlando (ORL) has issued a Call for Solutions for Soldier Virtual Training (SVT), Weapons Skills Development (WSD), and Joint Fires Trainer (JFT) systems. The solicitation, AOS Number W9128Z-25-S-A002, seeks both Commercial-off-the-Shelf (COTS) items and proposals for Other Transaction Authority (OTA) agreements for prototype development. The objective is to replace the aging Engagement Skills Trainer 2 (EST2) with modern virtual training solutions for weapons skills and joint fires. Submissions are due by May 22, 2026, for COTS marketplace entries and June 5, 2026, for OTA proposals. The call outlines detailed requirements for COTS WSD and JFT, including Tier 1 capabilities, and provides submission instructions for both COTS and OTA tracks. Non-government advisors will assist with evaluations, and companies must address Organizational Conflicts of Interest (OCI).

The document outlines a multi-tiered approach for a government system, detailing essential, enhanced, and future capabilities. Tier 1 lists non-negotiable requirements for basic system function, deployability, and Army MVP expectations, covering aspects like setup time, footprint, power, UI, data security, transportability, and core training support for small arms and crew-served weapons with specific recoil replication and weapon support. It also mandates integrated cybersecurity, 90-day delivery for up to 50 systems, and a 1-year OEM warranty. Tier 2 describes important enhancements for training realism and interoperability, such as supporting additional weapon systems (IAM, Carl Gustaf, Javelin), UAS/CUAS training, and higher system availability. Tier 3 focuses on future-oriented, advanced enhancements like expanded weapon support and STE integration. Finally, Tier 4 addresses long-term, optional capabilities, including support for future weapon systems and additional STE-wide interoperability, with a cost range for a 5-lane kit. A separate section details similar tiered requirements for a Joint Fires Trainer (JFT), covering certifications, emulation of various devices (M22 Binoculars, DAGR, PF-D), minimal instructor support, and FMV replication for CAS/UAS. The JFT tiers also outline enhancements like DAPS emulation, AFATDS compatibility, and immersive configurations, with future capabilities mirroring the WSD tiers for long-term growth and STE integration.

This government file addresses numerous questions and clarifications regarding the Weapon System Dismounted (WSD) and Joint Fires Trainer (JFT) systems, likely in the context of a Request for Proposal (RFP) or similar procurement. Key areas of clarification include WSD system connectivity to external networks, the provision of source documents like the "WSD MVP memo," and detailed requirements for WSD system configuration, transportability, and footprint. The document also seeks to resolve contradictions in weapon support statements for the M7 and M250, and clarifies expectations for marketplace updates, cybersecurity requirements, and ballistic validation. For the JFT, questions focus on COTS price catalog submissions, course of fire and scorecard availability, emulation fidelity, and proposal formatting. Additionally, the file addresses the applicability of certain defense program cost references, accreditation for JTAC training, student support capabilities, and the use of updated DA Forms for scorecards. Proprietary ballistic data and the availability of the STE SDK are also discussed, alongside the viewing of pricing in the marketplace and the scope of cybersecurity lead integrator responsibilities. The document also provides a distinction between Small Arms and Crew-Served Weapons for Table 1 and Table 2 requirements.

The Army Contracting Command – Aberdeen Proving Ground (ACC-APG), Orlando (ORL) has issued a Call for Solutions for Soldier Virtual Training (SVT), Weapons Skills Development (WSD), and Joint Fires Trainer (JFT). This solicitation seeks both Commercial-off-the-Shelf (COTS) items for immediate interim solutions and proposals for prototype development via Other Transaction Authority (OTA) agreements. The goal is to replace the aging Engagement Skills Trainer 2 (EST2) with modern virtual training systems. Submissions are due May 28, 2026, for COTS and June 12, 2026, for OTA proposals. Evaluation will focus on meeting specific Tier 1 requirements for COTS items or a comprehensive development plan for OTA prototypes. Companies must be registered in SAM and provide detailed documentation, including executive summaries, catalogs, and cost breakdowns. Non-government advisors will assist in the evaluation process.

This government file contains a series of questions and answers regarding the Weapon Simulation Device (WSD) and Joint Fires Trainer (JFT) systems. The inquiries cover various aspects, including network connectivity, system configuration, transportability, footprint dimensions, cybersecurity requirements, weapon system support (M7/M8 platforms), ballistic validation, user-generated content capabilities, JFT emulation fidelity, proposal formatting, milestone definitions, and pricing for Tier 1 through Tier 4 requirements. Key clarifications include the WSD not requiring external network connection for the marketplace, the acceptance of a roadmap for NGSW support, the ability to update marketplace items, and the transportability of a 5-lane system in a 1 1/4 ton truck. The document also addresses acceptable validation organizations, expected authoring capabilities, and the use of current DA Forms for scorecards. Additionally, it clarifies that ARDEC ballistic data will be Government Furnished Information (GFI) for OTA development, not for marketplace entry.

The document outlines a tiered requirement structure for government contracts, categorized into four tiers for systems related to weapons training (WSD) and joint fires (JFT). Tier 1 details essential, non-negotiable requirements, including system footprint, power, transportability, cybersecurity, and minimum training capabilities, crucial for basic functionality and Army MVP expectations. Tier 2 describes important enhancements that improve realism and interoperability but are not critical for the minimum viable product. Tier 3 focuses on future-focused, advanced enhancements that introduce new training domains and technologies, supporting modernization and long-term integration. Tier 4 represents long-term, optional, or specialized enhancements for future technologies, extended interoperability, and niche training scenarios. Each tier specifies requirements for hardware, software, training tasks, and delivery timelines, distinguishing between essential features and future growth potential.

The Army Contracting Command – Aberdeen Proving Ground (ACC-APG), Orlando (ORL) has issued a Call for Solutions for Soldier Virtual Training (SVT), Weapons Skills Development (WSD), and Joint Fires Trainer (JFT) systems. This solicitation, AOS Number W9128Z-25-S-A002, seeks both Commercial-off-the-Shelf (COTS) items for immediate interim needs and proposals for Other Transaction (OT) Agreements for prototype development. The WSD program aims to replace the aging Engagement Skills Trainer 2 (EST2), while the JFT program seeks interim COTS solutions and prototypes. Submissions are due by May 22, 2026, for COTS marketplace entries and June 5, 2026, for OTA proposals. Companies can respond to one or all four distinct calls: COTS WSD, COTS JFT, WSD OTA, and JFT OTA. Each response has specific submission requirements and evaluation criteria, including adherence to Tier 1 capabilities for COTS items and comprehensive development plans for OTA proposals. The government reserves the right to make multiple, single, or no awards, and awards are subject to funding availability.

The Department of the Army's Integrated Training Directorate is seeking a Commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) Soldier Virtual Trainer (SVT) Weapon Skills Development (WSD) system. This memorandum outlines the Minimum Viable Product (MVP) requirements for a portable, high-fidelity marksmanship trainer that can be deployed rapidly. The system must support five simultaneous training lanes, be transportable in a 1 ¼ ton truck, and set up within 30 minutes. Key features include a modular architecture, intuitive user interface, robust data management, and high operational readiness (90%+ availability). The SVT WSD must provide a semi-immersive simulation for individual and crew-served weapons, meeting Army Table I and Table II training requirements, with realistic ballistics and recoil. It must support various service weapons via

The U.S. Army Field Artillery School outlines training requirements for the Joint Fires Trainer (JFT), a new system replacing the Call-for-Fire Trainer III. The JFT must support Fire Support Team training and certification, adhere to Joint Fire Support Executive Steering Committee Action Plan Memorandum of Agreement, and emulate virtual military equipment such as M22 Binoculars and Precision Fires-Dismounted. It needs to be compact, durable, transportable, support 10-30 students with minimal instructor support, and utilize the Synthetic Training Environment (STE) Training Management Tool. Objective requirements include emulating additional virtual equipment like the Dismounted Assured PNT System and Joint Effects Targeting System, and supporting digital sensor-to-shooter training. The JFT will maintain institutional training capabilities and provide simulated military equipment for institutional systems. The system is not required to process classified data but must integrate with STE and support Secure but Unclassified-Encrypted networks.

The Cybersecurity Statement of Work (SOW) for the Soldier Virtual Trainer (SVT) outlines the cybersecurity requirements for vendors supporting the U.S. Army Program Executive Office Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation (PEO STRI). The SOW details the vendor's responsibilities, including acting as a Cybersecurity Lead Integrator, providing DevSecOps leadership, and establishing cybersecurity planning and strategy. Key areas of focus include vulnerability management, ensuring compliance and accreditation with RMF and STIG standards, and meticulous cybersecurity documentation. Vendors must integrate DevSecOps practices, conduct secure software development, and implement continuous monitoring. The SOW also mandates specific training for personnel with privileged access, emphasizing compliance with NIST SP 800-53, AR 25-2, and DoDM 8140.03. Incident response and recovery plans, including reporting cyber incidents within 72 hours, are also critical components of the SOW, ensuring robust security throughout the software lifecycle.

This document outlines the

This government file outlines the structure and requirements for a Solution Paper (SP) in response to an Army Open Solicitation (AOS) for the Soldier Virtual Trainer (SVT), Weapons Skills Device (WSD), or Joint Fires Trainer (JFT). The SP, which is valid for two years, requires companies to detail their technical solution, including background, industry experience, proposed milestones, technical strategy, maturity, success metrics, and implementation plans. It also mandates a fixed price breakdown, a Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) for follow-on production, a list of participants and sub-vendors, an Integrated Master Schedule (IMS), and technical data rights assertions. Traceability matrices and acronym definitions are optional but encouraged. The document emphasizes clear, detailed responses to enable the government to evaluate progress and potential for future phases.

This document outlines the Statement of Work (SOW) for the Army Open Solicitation (AOS) Call For Solutions (CFS) for the Soldier Virtual Trainer (SVT), Weapons Skills Device (WSD), or Joint Fires Trainer (JFT). It provides a structured template for companies to develop their SOW, detailing essential sections such as Background, Scope, Applicable Documents, Technical Requirements, Progress Reports, Government Furnished Information (GFI), Data Rights, Security Classification, Place of Performance, Success Criteria, and Follow-on Production. The SOW emphasizes clear, concise task descriptions, proper numbering, and compliance with government regulations for data rights and security. It also details the reporting requirements and outlines the process for potential follow-on production contracts without further competition upon successful completion of the prototype project, as per 10 U.S.C. 4022 (f).

The “Representation Regarding Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services and Equipment” provision, updated October 2020, outlines prohibitions for executive agencies concerning telecommunications and video surveillance equipment and services from certain entities. Stemming from the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, the regulation prohibits agencies from procuring or extending contracts for equipment or services that use “covered telecommunications equipment or services” as a substantial component. This includes direct procurement (effective August 13, 2019) and contracting with entities that use such equipment or services (effective August 13, 2020), regardless of whether the use is for federal contract performance. Exceptions include services connecting to third-party facilities (e.g., backhaul, roaming) and equipment unable to route user data traffic or permit visibility into user data. Members responding to solicitations must represent whether they will provide or use such equipment/services, and if so, provide detailed disclosures about the equipment, services, manufacturers, and proposed usage to determine permissibility under the prohibitions. Compliance requires checking the System for Award Management (SAM) for excluded parties.

The provided document outlines a pricing breakout structure for a performer, detailing costs across three distinct phases, each comprising multiple milestones. It includes fields for the performer's name, overall price, period of performance in months, and subtotals for each phase (Phase 1 Subtotal, Phase 2 Subtotal, Phase 3 Subtotal). Within each phase, specific milestones are itemized (Milestone 1A, 1B, 1C; Milestone 2A, 2B, 2C; Milestone 3A, 3B, 3C). The document concludes with a

The Army Contracting Command – Aberdeen Proving Ground (ACC-APG), Orlando (ORL) has issued a Call for Solutions for Soldier Virtual Training (SVT), Weapons Skills Development (WSD), and Joint Fires Trainer (JFT). This solicitation seeks both Commercial Off the Shelf (COTS) solutions for immediate needs and proposals for Other Transaction Agreements (OTAs) for prototype development to replace the aging Engagement Skills Trainer 2 (EST2) and fulfill Joint Fires Trainer requirements. The call is divided into four distinct response areas: COTS WSD, COTS JFT, OTA WSD, and OTA JFT, each with specific submission instructions, evaluation criteria, and deadlines. Submissions for COTS Marketplace are due by May 22, 2026, and OTA Proposals by June 5, 2026. The government aims to establish marketplaces for COTS items and award OTAs for developmental solutions, with potential for follow-on production contracts.

The Army Open System Cloud Federal Services (AOS CFS) framework has established a marketplace to streamline the procurement of solutions for modernizing tactical training environments, specifically for the Weapon Skills Development (WSD) and Joint Fires Trainer (JFT) programs. This post-competition hub facilitates rapid acquisition of interim military training capabilities using Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS) items, bypassing lengthy solicitation periods for individual units. The marketplace enables direct unit procurement and serves as a vital platform for market research, informing the development of future permanent systems. Key objectives include rapid deployment of solutions to fill capability gaps and streamlined support through contractor warranties, eliminating the need for US Government life-cycle oversight.

The document outlines a comprehensive self-evaluation form for proposals related to Weapons Skills Device (WSD) Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) items, likely for a federal government RFP. It is structured into three main sections: Screening Questions, Scorecard, and Tier 1 Requirements. The Screening Questions section acts as a gatekeeper, requiring

This government file outlines screening questions and requirements for a Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS) offering, likely for a federal or state RFP. It details mandatory documentation, including an Executive Summary, COTS catalog, Evaluation Scorecard, and Company Information sheet. The document emphasizes that failure to include these items or answer

The document "Att_01_WSD_COTS_Company_Information_and_Assertions" is a form for companies to provide essential information and make assertions relevant to government contracts, likely for federal RFPs or grants. It requests details such as company name and address, point of contact, CAGE code, UEI, SAM Registration expiration, and Wide Area Workflow registration status. Additionally, it asks about Non-Traditional Defense Contractor (NDC) and Small Business status, and whether the company is suspended, debarred, or otherwise prohibited from receiving an award. The document defines an NDC as an entity not performing Department of Defense contracts subject to full cost accounting standards for at least one year prior to solicitation.

The document "Att_01_JFT_COTS_Company_Information_and_Assertions" is a form for collecting essential company information relevant to government procurement. It requests details such as company name and address, point of contact for contracts, CAGE code, UEI, SAM registration expiration date, and whether the company is registered with Wide Area Workflow. Additionally, it asks about the company's Non-Traditional Defense Contractor (NDC) status, small business status, and any suspension or debarment from receiving awards. The document includes a definition of an NDC, clarifying that it refers to an entity that has not performed certain Department of Defense contracts subject to full cost accounting standards for at least one year. This form serves as a standardized method for the government to gather crucial contractor data for RFPs, grants, and other solicitations.